Instructor(s): David Schneiderman

Note: This course satisfies the International/Comparative/Transnational course requirement.

At present there is an unprecedented and ongoing world-wide conversation about how to resolve contentious constitutional questions. There is, in other words, more convergence over answers to constitutional questions and less divergence than has been seen in modern times. A part of that conversation concerns which precedents, issuing out of which jurisdictions, provide models for judicial decision making and which should be strenuously avoided.  

This seminar will examine a sub-set of what might be called the comparative constitutional law canon. Of interest will be the various jurisdictions and cases that serve as both models of constitutional analysis and as anti-models. The focus for discussion this year will be on comparative freedom of expression doctrine and the application of proportionality analysis to free speech. Selected regional approaches, some free speech theory, and historic moments that inform contemporary constitutional analysis will be examined.

Evaluation
Paper of 3,750 – 5,000 words in length (approximately 15 – 20 pages) worth 90 per cent of the final grade plus a set of questions for one of the assigned readings to be discussed in class, posted in advance, worth 10 per cent of the final grade.
Academic year
2023 - 2024

At a Glance

Second Term
Credits
2
Hours
2
ICT

Enrolment

Maximum
20

18 JD
2 LLM/SJD/MSL/SJD U

Schedule

T: 4:10 - 6:00 pm