IIO Speaker Series: UNDRIP – What the Next Generation of Lawyers Needs to Know

NOTE: The Indigenous Initiatives Office (IIO) Speaker Series is open to the public. All are welcome and lunch will be served. Please join us.

Headnotes - Sep 23 2019

Announcements

Web Site and Headnotes

Website features: News categories
University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Want to find out more about what's been happening at U of T law related to a particular program or area of law?

A feature of the website is the ability to search news items according to specific categories: a particular program, a focus area, a legal specialization, or a particular faculty member.

On the News page (www.law.utoronto.ca/news), drop-down menus on the left allow you to choose which category you want to look at (you can even combine categories for very targeted searches). You can quickly access the news page at any time by clicking on "More News" at the bottom of the recent news items on the home page. News items have been categorized back to June 2011.

Faculty of Law alumni e.newsletter for September
Faculty of Law alumni e.newsletter for September

Every month, the Faculty of Law sends an email newsletter to alumni to keep them up to date with the latest law school news and events.

Read the September 2019 Law e.newsletter to alumni

Deans' Offices

Mindfulness Mondays - Intro to Mindfulness session - Sept 30 at 12:30

Mindfulness Mondays - Intro to Mindfulness Session - Sept 30 at 12:30

The Faculty of Law offers a 6-session mindfulness training program as part of its wellness programming. 

Facilitated by meditation expert Eli Weisbaum, session 1 provides an introduction to mindfulness, an overview of the neuroscience, and time to practice mindfulness skills.

For more information about the mindfulness program at the law school, and to register for this and future sessions, please click here.

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
Flv 223
Event conditions:
Registration required
Leadership Skills Program, Team Matters, Oct 3rd at 12:30

Team Matters: Becoming a great team player

Problems worth solving rarely yield to solo efforts. This is especially true of the complex problems 21st century lawyers and other professionals are called upon to help solve.

In this workshop, we will explore team dynamics and teach you concrete collaboration skills that you can add to your professional toolbox, such as:  

  • Recognizing and using six different types of “meeting talk” 
  • Building more effect team interactions around parallel thinking
  • Broadening your horizons around team norms
  • Appreciating and articulating the importance of teaming skills

This highly interactive workshop will group you in teams and take you through a number of fun, skill-building activities.

Tuesday October 3rd, 12:30 – 2:00, Location J125

Presenter: Professor Dan Ryan

To register, click here

Date of event:
Thu. Oct. 3, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J125
Event conditions:
Registration required
Lawyers Doing Cool Things, David Forsayeth, J.D. 2011

Lawyers Doing Cool Things - David Forsayeth, J.D. 2011

Dave is the Director, Legal and Corporate Affairs for Flipp Corporation. Flipp is a Toronto-based tech company with over 400 employees that has developed an App and retail technology platform that help North American consumers find value, savings, and deals in their weekly shopping, and helps retailers, consumer packaged goods companies, and quick service restaurants transition their print merchandising to the digital age. Dave has been with Flipp for 3 years, prior to which he was an associate in the Corporate Group at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP  specializing in private M&A.

Date and time: Monday September 30, 12:30

To register, click here

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 12:30pm
Event conditions:
Registration required
Grand Moot: Correctional Segregation & the Charter

Do not miss this year's Grand Moot on Thursday, October 3 in the Moot  Court Room.  Watch four of the law school's most skilled mooters (Eileen Church Carson, Spence Colburn, Julie Lowenstein, and Will Maidment) make submissions on the constitutionality of solitary confinement in front of the Honourable Chief Justice Richard Wagner (Supreme Court of Canada), Chief Justice George Strathy (Ontario Court of Appeal) and Justice Breese Davies (Ontario Superior Court).  Doors open at 4:30 pm.--spillover viewing available in J140!

Date of event:
Thu. Oct. 3, 2019, 5:00pm
Location:
Moot Court Room (Jackman 250)
Wright Lecture: Philip Pettit on The Elusive Sovereign
Philip Pettit

Please attend the Wright Lecture, one of the law school's most important scholarly events of the academic year on Thursday, October 10 beginning at 4:10 pm in Jackman 140.  Professor Pettit will explore whether the idea of sovereignty can find a natural home within a mixed or decentered set of legal arrangements. 

Date of event:
Thu. Oct. 10, 2019, 4:15am
Bleached out: A Race and the Law Discussion Group - Session #1

Bleached out: A Race and the Law Discussion Group - Session #1

The Race and the Law discussion group at the Faculty of Law is devoted to bringing a critical race theory lens to the study, promulgation, and practice of law. This discussion group is offered at a time when the Law Society of Ontario plans to re-consider its diversity statement, when the profession struggles with a lack of diversity, and when access to justice is inversely correlated with race, class and other identifiers.  Bringing an intersectional lens to the study of law, the Race and the Law discussion group will introduce students to foundational texts in critical race studies and their implications for the study and practice of law.  In addition to providing a grounding in the language and analytic framework of critical race studies, the discussion group will also be a venue for racialized students and others to explore openly and in a safe environment the affective challenges that arise in professional cultures that construct professionalism in bleached-out terms. This is a non-credit, co-curricular activity.

Session #1: Thursday September 26th, 12:30 - 2:00

To register for this and other sessions, click here.

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Event conditions:
Registration required
Emerging Issues Workshop Series: Defamation & Harassment in the Age of Social Media

Emerging Issues Workshop Series

Defamation & Harassment in the Age of Social Media

 

 

Wednesday September 25th

12:45-1:45 pm

Jackman Law Building

Room J130

Panelists: Alexi Wood and Jennifer Saville, St. Lawrence Barristers LLP 

 

Please note that lunch will not be served, but you are welcome to bring food & eat during the session.

 Registration is not required, but capacity is limited. 

Come early to avoid disappointment!

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 25, 2019, 12:45pm
Location:
J130
Event conditions:
First come first served.
Distinguished Visitors and Special Lectures Nominations

Dear Faculty and Students: 

We invite you to make nominations for Distinguished Visitors during the 2020-2021 academic year.  Distinguished Visitors can be invited to teach intensive courses, give special lectures (for a list of such lectures, see http://www.law.utoronto.ca/scholarship-publications/special-lectures) or some variation or combination of those, including shorter visits that might revolve around lectures and workshops. 


Please send written nominations to me at sara.faherty@utoronto.ca by Monday, September 30, 2019.   


Well-supported nominations will answer the following questions:
 
(1)   Does the candidate bring some new set of ideas to the Faculty, i.e., ideas that are not currently the focus of existing courses or that will change the way we think about existing courses?


(2)   Is the candidate an exciting figure in his or her field?  This is not a requirement that that the person be famous.  Rather, make a brief argument for why the Faculty should seriously consider this person.  Examples of work, short biographies, and CVs would assist in answering this question and in considering the candidate.

 
(3)   Is this person excellent in the classroom?  Do you see the course as attracting students at the same time as enriching their intellectual life? 


(4)   Is the set of ideas one that will enrich the intellectual life of the Faculty?

 
(5)   Is the faculty nominator or principal faculty nominator willing to participate in the intensive, perhaps to the extent of team teaching?  Is the proposed visitor involved in an ongoing research project with the faculty nominator?

The Distinguished Visitors and Special Lecturers Selection Committee will review the nominations.

 

Sara Faherty

Assistant Dean, Academic

University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Student Office

Become a JD Student Ambassador
Become a JD Ambassador

VOLUNTEER TO BE A JD STUDENT AMBASSADOR

Did you take a law school tour or attend an admissions info event before you were admitted?  

The JD Admissions Office is seeking JD students in all years to volunteer as JD Ambassadors.

Under the direction of the Senior Recruitment, Admissions & Diversity Outreach Officer, JD Ambassadors will engage with prospective students, applicants and newly admitted students to motivate them to enrol in the Faculty.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* BE VALUED & MAKE A DIFFERENCE *
You can have a direct impact on the composition of future classes. Incoming students who have interacted with current JD students and alumni consistently rave about the value of their engagement. 
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* EVERYONE IS ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE*
We seek a mix of Ambassadors in order to support the wide range of educational backgrounds, life experiences and demographics of our prospective students and applicants.  
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* REASONABLE TIME COMMITMENT *
The commitment is quite light enough not to be a strain with other commitments. Allot 4-6 hours per term (typically an average of 1 hr /three weeks) to volunteer. We will work around your personal schedule.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* MAIN DUTIES *

1. LAW SCHOOL TOURS [80%]
Conducting tours that highlight key activities, services, facilities and personnel, and how they relate positively to the student experience. Tour groups range from 1 - 8 people comprising primarily of prospective students, applicants and their relatives/families. Tours are normally 45 min in length, scheduled within the 12:30-2:00 pm period on weekdays. Training will be provided.

2. INFORMATION EVENTS [10%]
Assisting with on-campus and off-campus events, such as Welcome Day, open houses, info sessions and education/career fairs. etc. The majority of events are on weekdays, with possibly 3-5 events held on a weekend day (usually Saturday).

3. E-ENGAGEMENT [10%]
Corresponding with prospective and incoming students via social media, email and live online chats.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* QUALIFICATIONS *

Candidates must be:
- in ANY JD year of study, from1L to 4L(for combined programs)
- in pursuit of any legal area of interest
- in good academic standing at the Faculty 
- willing and able to be a positive and responsible representative of the Faculty and University

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* SIGN-UP TODAY ONLINE *

To be a new Ambassador
Complete and submit the online application asap at https://forms.gle/zZifRNLfKmSiC4H99


A resume or cover letter is not required, just the completed online form.
The first round of selections will be made from the applications received by September 18

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* HELP *

Jerome Poon-Ting
Senior Recruitment, Admissions & Diversity Outreach Officer
JD Admissions Office
jerome.poon.ting@utoronto.ca

tel: 416-978-3716

Academic Events

Legal History Workshop

The Osgoode Society Legal History Workshop is an informal evening seminar that meets on alternate Wednesdays between September and April to discuss a wide variety of topics in legal history, Canadian and international.  Participants are graduate students and faculty in law and history from U of T, York, McMaster and other institutions, as well as law students and members of the profession.  

Anybody interested in legal history is welcome to attend. If you would like to be put on the e-mail list and to receive the papers and other announcements by e-mail, please e-mail j.phillips@utoronto.ca. The schedule for this term follows.  

All Sessions begin at 6.30. All Sessions except for October 15 in Room J230, Jackman Hall, University of Toronto

Wednesday September 11: Nancy Wright, University of Victoria: “The Laphroaig Leasehold:  Popular Interpretations of Feudal Tenures.”  

Wednesday September 25: Jim Phillips, University of Toronto: ‘The Canadian Court System, 1867-1914’

Tuesday October 15:  Note the Tuesday. Donal Coffey,Max Planck Institute: ‘Newfoundland and Dominion Status.’ Held in Room 223, Flavelle House

Wednesday October 30: Philip Girard, Osgoode Hall Law School: ‘The Contrasting Fates of French-Canadian and Indigenous Constitutionalism: British North America, 1763-1867.’

Wednesday November 6: Eric Adams, University of Alberta: ‘Constitutional Wrongs: A Legal History of Japanese Canadians’

Wednesday November 13: Joseph Kary, Kary and Kwan: Sonderkommando in Canada: Montreal's first World War II War Crimes Trial, 1951-1956

Wednesday November 27: Patricia McMahon, Tory’s: ‘Radioactive: The Life and Lies of Boris Pregel’

 

Justice Ian Binnie Lecture - “Fire and Fury in the Courtroom” – NEW DATE

Date:  Monday, October 21, 2019

Time:  12:30 – 2:00 pm

Location: J140

 

Former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie will address law students and faculty.

 

All law students and faculty are welcome. 

 

Please RSVP to associatedean.law@utoronto.ca

Legal History Workshop

The Osgoode Society Legal History Workshop is an informal evening seminar that meets on alternate Wednesdays between September and April to discuss a wide variety of topics in legal history, Canadian and international.  Participants are graduate students and faculty in law and history from U of T, York, McMaster and other institutions, as well as law students and members of the profession. 

The workshop meets at 6.30 p.m. in J230. 

Anybody interested in legal history is welcome to attend. If you would like to be put on the e-mail list and to receive the papers and other announcements by e-mail, please e-mail j.phillips@utoronto.ca.

Wednesday September 25: Jim Phillips, University of Toronto: ‘Creating and Staffing the Dominion Court System, 1867-1914’.

The James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop: Alice G. Abreu

The James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop 

Presents:

Alice G. Abreu
Temple University, Beasley School of Law

Relying on IRS Publications: A Taxpayer's Right

Wednesday September 25, 2019
12:30pm - 2:00pm
 Falconer Hall, 84 Queen's Park
Solarium(FA2)

ABSTRACT: The IRS takes the position that taxpayers are not entitled to rely on written statements that it makes in instructions to IRS forms and in Publications that are designed for the specific purpose of helping taxpayers meet their tax obligations.  And the courts have approved that position, stating that “taxpayers rely at their peril” on IRS written statements in publications. We believe that the IRS position impugns the legitimacy of the agency and of the tax system; we can also show that it is unnecessary for the IRS to take such a position because in most of the cases in which the courts invoke the “reliance at peril” mantra, there was either no reliance, or the reliance was unreasonable. Invocation of the mantra therefore serves only to threaten the legitimacy of the tax system and the IRS.  For those reasons alone, the IRS should announce that taxpayers can indeed rely on what it says in its publications and instructions to forms.  If the IRS does not want to go that far, it can at least exercise its enforcement discretion to decline to enforce against taxpayers positions that run counter to those it has clearly expressed in publication or instructions to forms.  If the IRS declines to do even that, courts can ameliorate the damage to the legitimacy of the tax system by not invoking the reliance-at-peril mantra when it is not relevant either because there is no evidence of reliance or because any reliance was unreasonable. But if the IRS and the courts are not willing to change their position for the reasons just articulated, we offer an additional, possibly more compelling, reason:  the IRS’s adoption and subsequent congressional enactment of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR).  The TBOR contains as the very first taxpayer right, the right to be informed.  In this article we develop the ideas we’ve explored in prior work on the effect of the TBOR by focusing on its potential to change both the IRS’s position on the taxpayer’s ability to reasonably rely on written statements intended for their guidance, and the courts’ response to such reliance. We also suggest that if the IRS persists in taking litigating positions in contravention of the statements it has made in its own publications and instructions to forms, taxpayers should ask courts to estop the IRS from doing so. We recognize that asserting equitable estoppel against the government is difficult, but, again, we believe that the enactment of the TBOR provides a basis for a change in the status quo.

Alice G. Abreu is a Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she teaches courses in Taxation, Corporate Taxation, Low Income Taxpayer Policy and Practice, and International Taxation.  She is a magna cum laude graduate of both Cornell University and its Law School, where she served as an editor of the Cornell Law Review. Before joining the Temple faculty in 1985, she clerked for Judge Edward N. Cahn (EDPA) and practiced tax law with Dechert, LLP, in Philadelphia.  Professor Abreu has published numerous articles in scholarly and professional journals, been an editor of a casebook on Taxation, and is a frequent speaker at national and international conferences. 

 If you would like more information about these workshops, please send an email to events.law@utoronto.ca

Critical Analysis of Law Workshop: Cindy Ewing

Critical Analysis of Law Workshop

Presents:

Cindy Ewing
Department of History, University of Toronto

Codifying Minority Rights: Postcolonial Constitutionalism in Burma, Ceylon, and India

Tuesday September 24, 2019 
12:30pm - 2pm
Falconer Hall, 84 Queen's Park,
Solarium, FA2

Cindy Ewing is the Assistant Professor of Contemporary International History in the Department of History and the International Relations Program at Trinity College. Her research and teaching focus on the international history of the Cold War and postcolonial South and Southeast Asia. Cindy's scholarship examines the interconnections between decolonization and other global processes of the twentieth century, including the trajectories of nationalism, postcolonialism, international human rights, neutralism and non-alignment, and the development of international institutions such as the United Nations. Cindy earned her Ph.D. with distinction from Yale University in May 2018 and has held fellowships with the University of Virginia, the University of Texas at Austin, the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies. Cindy welcomes students interested in post-1945 international history, modern South Asia, and modern Southeast Asia.

 If you would like more information about these workshops, please send an email to events.law@utoronto.ca

Mary and Philip Seeman Health Law, Policy & Ethics Seminar Series: John Dawson

Mary and Phillip Seeman Health Law, Policy & Ethics Seminar

Presents:

John Dawson
Faculty of Law, University of Otago

"House arrest" under a Community Treatment Order and the Interpretation of Mental Health Legislation

Thursday September 26, 2019
12:30pm – 2:00pm
Solarium (FA2), 84 Queen’s Park

John Dawson's particular interests are in mental health law, the law governing health information, public law and socio-legal research. He was educated in New Zealand and North America, at Otago and Harvard universities, and has taught as a visitor at McGill in Montreal and at the University of Toronto. The main focus of his research is the law governing involuntary psychiatric treatment and legal relations between mental health professionals and their clients. He studies these matters in the law books and in fieldwork conducted within the mental health services. Often this involves collaboration with health professionals and social scientists. I have also had a long involvement with law reform. In my secondary field of research, public law, his focus has been on relations between the NZ state and Maori, and on Treaty of Waitangi settlements.

If you would like more information about these workshops, please send an email to events.law@utoronto.ca

 

Student Activities

ILS Presents: 1L Summers in International Law

It's never too early to start thinking about how to spend your 1L summer! Join the International Law Society on Thursday, September 26th at 12:30 in J130 to hear from current upper year students about their experiences at the United Nations, Permanent Court of Arbitration, and International Criminal Court, to name a few. Lunch will be served.

Thursday, September 26th

12:30-2:00 PM

J130

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J130
iTrek Israel Trip Info Session

Come to Israel with your fellow U of T Law students on iTrek!

iTrek is a highly subsidized 7 day trip to Israel from May 2 - May 9 open to all U of T Law students. Over the course of the trip we will explore Israel’s cultural landscape, legal environment, nightlife, high-tech industry, history, and politics. All led by your fellow law students! Come out to the info session to learn more.

Date: Thursday, September 26
Time: 12:30 – 2:00pm 
Location: J125

Sign up for First Generation Network!

If you are a first generation student,* please fill out this link to ensure you receive all communications about social events, networking, and mentorship from the First Generation Network:
https://firstgennetwork.typeform.com/to/elLbXI

*Typically “first generation” means that you’re the first person in your family to attend post-secondary education, but use your discretion. If your parents attended post-secondary education but never used their degree in a related way, you could justify being part of the network. Please contact Robert Nanni if you have any questions.

Forum: Fighting Fake News then and now – lessons from a watershed moment for Chinese Canadians 40 years ago

In partnership with the Asia Law Students Society, International Human Rights Program (IHRP), and Osler, we invite you to join our forum marking the 40th Anniversary of the Anti-W5 campaign. On September 30, 1979, CTV broadcasted a program depicting Chinese Canadian students on University of Toronto campus as “foreigners”. This led to the creation of the Chinese Canadian National Council (CCNC) and its later campaigns, including the Head Tax redress movement. While we celebrate and take lessons learned from Chinese Canadian progressive movements in the past 40 years, we continue to challenge and fight racism today.

Event Description and Registration:

https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/fighting-fake-news-then-and-now-lessons-from-a-watershed-moment-for-chinese-canadians-40-years-ago-tickets-70795795129

Date and Location

Monday, September 30th from 7-9 pm at the Jackman Building P105, 78 Queens Park, Toronto, Ontario

Organizer:

Chinese Canadian National Council for Social Justice (CCNCSJ)

Co-Sponsors:

Asia Law Students Society, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

International Human Rights Program (IHRP), University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Agenda:

7:00 p.m. Interviews with panel of speakers

7:45 p.m. Dialogues with audience

8:30 p.m. Mingling over coffee and snacks

Facilitators:

Ryan Chan, President, Asia Law Students Society

Susan Eng, Senior Fellow, Advocacy for the National Institute on Aging

Speakers:

Dr. Alan Tai-Wai Li, Past President, CCNC

Lilian Ma, Founding Director, CCNC

Vincent Wong, Adjunct Professor and Research Associate, IHRP

 

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 7:00am
Location:
Jackman Law Building P105
SLS Clothing Sales
Images of Faculty of Law clothing options

Hey Everyone! If you’re in search of U of T law-branded clothing to show off to your friends and family, looking for a personalized gift, or just hoping to stay warm during the next polar vortex - look no further, SLS has you covered!

 

We're selling U of T Law branded apparel with a wider variety of styles and colours than currently offered at the bookstore. Take a look at the apparel and place an order through our e-store website: http://studentslawsociety-webstore.com/

 

PLEASE NOTE: the e-store website has been changed from its original URL: www.uoftfacultyoflaw-webstore.com to: http://studentslawsociety-webstore.com/. Also, the new website has been updated with sizing charts. 

 

The e-store closes on October 15th and all clothing orders will be delivered to the law school by November 8th. Order your clothing before its too late!

 

Kind regards,

 

SLS Social Committee

Life as a Tax Lawyer

On Thursday, September 26 from 12:30-2:00 at P120, the University of Toronto Tax Law Society will be hosting a panel of tax practitioners. This is a great networking opportunity for those interested in tax and corporate law or for those who want to learn more about the different career paths available in tax! Free food will be provided.

Speakers:
Lara Friedlander - CIBC, Vice-President, Tax Planning and Advisory
Patrick Marley - Osler, Partner
Jacob Yau - Dentons, Associate
Kim Wharram - CRA, Senior Rulings Officer
Devon LaBuik - Associate, Fasken

 

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
P120
Call for Exams, Summaries, Maps, etc. for the SLS Database

Hi all! This is a call for past exams, summaries, maps, etc. for the SLS Database.

To submit exams

Email records.law@utoronto.ca for your exams and forward them (with their associated grades) to studentslawsociety@gmail.com – we will redact identifying information and upload them to the SLS Dropbox. Your grades will remain confidential. All grades are welcome!

To submit summaries/notes/maps/etc.

Email them directly to to studentslawsociety@gmail.com

Out in Law Presents: Bi Movie Night!

Join Out in Law in celebrating Bisexual Awareness Week at our first Bi Movie Night, featuring 2014's "Appropriate Behaviour"! BYOS (Bring Your Own Snacks), but we'll have the popcorn ready! 

(Friends & allies welcome)

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 6:00am
Location:
P120
Women & the Law Cupcake Social

Join Women & the Law for our Cupcake Social on Wednesday September 25th from 12:30–2:00 PM in J225. Drop in, grab a cupcake, and meet the 2019/2020 executive team!

This event is your opportunity to find out more about Women & the Law, learn about the events we have planned, and let us know what you would like to get out of the club this year. It's also a great way to meet and engage with other students at the law school. We hope to see you there!

https://www.facebook.com/events/758543524594400/

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 25, 2019, 12:30pm
U of T Legal Hackers - Kick-off and Housing Law Workshop

U of T Legal Hackers will be kicking off their development project with a Housing Law workshop! Benjamin Ries, staff lawyer in the housing division at Downtown Legal Services, will be giving a presentation.

This year, our development project is focused on how legal tech can help people secure safe housing conditions and fight illegal evictions. We will be building two tools that can be integrated later:

1. A registry of all landlord-tenant interactions in order to reconstruct a timeline to streamline dispute resolution.
2. A chat-bot that assists tenants in gathering the appropriate documents to challenge an eviction. 

Our project will require a variety of legal research; from surveying the key players in housing law to considering the privacy law implications of web apps that store personal information. Join us on October 1st to get started! 

Lunch will be served. Please feel free to email uoftlegalhackers@gmail.com if you have any questions. 

Date of event:
Tue. Oct. 1, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J125

Centres, Legal Clinics, and Special Programs

Oct 2: Asper Centre Constitutional Roundtable with Prof Brandon Garrett of Duke University School of Law

“Wealth, Equal Protection and Due Process” – A Constitutional Roundtable with Professor Brandon Garrett

With UTLaw's Associate Professor Vincent Chiao as Discussant

October 2 @ 12:30 pm - 2:00 pm in Jackman J125

On Wednesday October 2, 2019 Professor Brandon Garrett will present a Constitutional Roundtable titled “Wealth, Equal Protection and Due Process” based on his recently published paper. Professor Garrett joined the Duke University School of Law faculty in 2018 as the inaugural L. Neil Williams, Jr. Professor of Law. A leading scholar of criminal justice outcomes, evidence, and constitutional rights, Garrett previously was the White Burkett Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs and Justice Thurgood Marshall Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia.

Professor Brandon Garrett’s current research and teaching interests focus on forensic science, eyewitness identification, corporate crime, constitutional rights and habeas corpus, and criminal justice policy. His work has been widely cited by courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, lower federal courts, state supreme courts, and courts in other countries, such as the Supreme Courts of Canada and Israel. Garrett also frequently speaks about criminal justice matters before legislative and policy making bodies, groups of practicing lawyers, law enforcement, and to local and national media. He is involved with a number of law reform initiatives, including the American Law Institute’s project on policing, for which he serves as Associate Reporter.

Professor Vincent Chiao, B.A. (University of Virginia), Ph.D. (Northwestern), J.D. (Harvard), researches and teaches primarily in the area of criminal law and criminal justice, with a particular interest in the philosophical examination of its doctrine and institutions. He is the author of Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State (Oxford University Press 2018). He is also responsible for overseeing the Faculty of Law's appellate criminal law externship, which provides selected third year JD students with the opportunity to work directly on criminal appeals, including before the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada.

ABSTRACT: Increasingly, constitutional litigation challenging wealth inequality focuses on the intersection of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. That intersection—between equality and due process—deserves far more careful exploration. What I call “equal process” claims arise from a line of Supreme Court and lower court cases in which wealth inequality is the central concern. For example, the Supreme Court in Bearden v. Georgia conducted analysis of a claim that criminal defendants were treated differently based on wealth in which due process and equal protection principles converged. That equal process connection is at the forefront of a wave of national litigation concerning some of the most pressing civil rights issues of our time, including:the constitutionality of fines, fees, and costs; detention of immigrants and criminal defendants for inability to pay cash bail; loss of voting rights; and a host of other ways in which the indigent face both unfair process and disparate burdens. I argue that an intersectional “equal process” approach to these cases better reflects both longstanding constitutional doctrine and the practical stakes in such litigation. If courts properly understand this connection between inequality and unfair process, they will design more suitable and effective remedies. More broadly, scholars have bemoaned how the Court turned away from class based heightened scrutiny in equal protection doctrine. Equal process theory has the potential to reinvigorate the Fourteenth Amendment as a guardian against unfair process and discrimination that increases inequality in society.

Please email tal.schreier@utoronto.ca for further information.

Light lunch will be provided

Date of event:
Wed. Oct. 2, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J125 Jackman Law building
Sept 26: IHRP Film Screening of Umbrella Diaries: The First Umbrella

Umbrella Diaries

“The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage…”

- Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45

  • What: Umbrella Diaries: The First Umbrella (119 mins, Cantonese with English Subtitles) followed by Q&A with James Leong, director, and Vincent Wong, Adjunct Professor and Research Associate, International Human Rights Program
  • Where: Moot Court Room, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
  • When: September 26, 2019 at 7:00 PM

Event co-sponsored by the International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law and the UofT HK Extradition Law Awareness Group. 

Registration (free)

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/five-years-after-the-first-umbrellas-film-screening-of-umbrella-diaries-tickets-72370763903

Event Description

On August 31, 2014, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress issued an interpretation of the Hong Kong Basic Law. It confirmed that the universal suffrage promised to the territory to select its Chief Executive would be limited to choosing between two or three candidates already vetted by Beijing. The pro-democratic opposition was outraged.

This sparked an unprecedented 79-day protest occupation of the streets of Central Hong Kong beginning September 26. The term “umbrella movement” was coined from the protestors’ use of umbrellas to block the police’s pepper spray and tear gas. The occupation was largely felt to be a failure, having garnered no government concessions. Many protest leaders have since been charged with public order offenses; some are still in prison today. However, the citizens’ anger and fear have not dissipated in five years since.

To mark the fifth anniversary of these events, which form a critical background to the current violent unrest around the proposed extradition bill in Hong Kong, the International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto will be hosting a screening of Umbrella Diaries: the First Umbrella. The film chronicles the lead-up and first few days of the occupation. A Q&A with director James Leong, videoconferencing from Hong Kong, will follow.

Donations for the production of a sequel would be appreciated by the filmmakers.

Synopsis

"Umbrella Diaries: The First Umbrella" charts the origins of Hong Kong's Umbrella Movement through the eyes of the activists and ordinary people who made it happen. From the June 4th Candlelit Vigil until September 28th, when tens of thousands of protestors occupied the streets outside Government Headquarters, this documentary puts us at the heart of the action, allowing viewers to experience the highs and lows of that remarkable summer, when Hong Kong witnessed a “blossoming of democracy”.

James Leong's documentaries have screened at festivals such as Hotdocs, IDFA and Yamagata. Homeless FC (2006) won the top prize at the Chinese Documentary Festival in Hong Kong. Wukan (2015) was awarded Best Feature at the Freedom Film Festival and the Chinese Documentary Festival, and received a special mention at the Dubai International Film Festival. Umbrella Diaries: The First Umbrella has been nominated for Best Feature Documentary at the 55th Golden Horse Awards.

 

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 7:00pm
Location:
Jackman Building, Moot Court Room (J250)

Career Development Office and Employment Opportunities

The Faculty’s graduate program is currently recruiting for 14 work study positions,

Graduate Programs

The Faculty’s graduate program is currently recruiting for 14 work study positions, including positions which support:

  • course development and research;
  • IT and classroom technology;
  • recruitment and admissions;
  • career mentoring;
  • and more

 

All postings are available on UTLawCareers. 

Asper Centre Research Assistant position - Application Due on Monday Sept 23, 12pm

The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights is seeking a research assistant to undertake the Asper Centre’s contribution to the Media Freedom Project led by the International Human Rights Program. This position requires excellent library research skills, strong computer skills, attention to detail and a demonstrated interest in constitutional law.

Qualifications:  Candidates must be a current  2L, 3L, or a graduate student in law

Remuneration:  The hourly rate for this position is expected to be $25.00 – $30.00 per hour (plus 4% vacation pay), depending upon qualifications, and subject to deductions required by law

To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, undergraduate and law school transcripts, and a brief writing sample by email to cheryl.milne@utoronto.ca by 12:00 p.m. on Monday, September 23, 2019.
.

Journals, Research, and Scholarship

Journal of Law & Equality - Call for Submissions

Journal of Law & Equality: Call for Submissions (Suggested Deadline: September 20, 2019)

The Journal of Law & Equality (JLE) is a peer-reviewed journal at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law. We aim to promote critical and informed debate on equality issues, with special emphasis on the Canadian context. The JLE publishes peer-reviewed full-length articles, case comments, notes, and book reviews by professors, judges, practitioners, and students across Canada.

 Though we accept submissions on a rolling basis, we encourage you to submit by September 20, 2019 to ensure publication, if accepted, in this academic year. 

 To make a submission, please visit our online submissions system at https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/utjle/index. To contact us, please email jle.editor@utoronto.ca.

-- 

Angela Hou and Amit Singh
Editors-in-Chief, 2019-2020
Journal of Law & Equality

Website: https://jle.law.utoronto.ca
Submissions: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/utjle/index

 

Bookstore

Bookstore Fall Extended Hours

Bookstore Extended Hours for Back-to-School

August 19-31: Monday-Friday 11 am - 5 pm

Sept 1-14: Monday-Thursday 9 am - 5 pm, Friday 11 am - 7 pm

Sept 15-28: Monday-Thursday 10 am - 4 pm, Friday 3 pm - 7 pm

 

 

Come for the books, and as a bonus find Law swag, study necessities, and friendly staff!

Study in Style

Study in (Law) Style

Pick up comfortable and stylish U of T Law clothing and

Study in Style!

Check out our exclusive U of T Law sweaters

plus, SAVE on U of T wear:

  • U of T Essentials Sweatpants are $10 off until Sept 28

  • U of T Essentials Ball Cap is $5 off until Sept 28

 

Back To School Deals End Soon

Ending Soon: Back To School special prices end Sept 28

Still on sale:

  • U of T Essentials Ball Caps
  • U of T Essentials Sweatpants
  • Printers (3-in-1 printers less than $50!)
  • Lined paper
  • Notebooks
  • Combination Locks

Great prices this week only

Study Gear!

The Law Bookstore has all the study equipment you need!

Get your studying game into high gear with

  • Highlighters (all kinds of shapes and colours)
  • 3x5 cue cards
  • Sticky notes
  • Notebooks
  • Binders and 3-ring paper

PLUS study in comfort and style with our line of U of T Law sweaters and T-shirts

 

The Law Bookstore: More than Just Textbooks

Regular Term Hours

Bookstore Regular Hours begin September 30

Mon-Thurs 11:30 am - 2:30 pm

Friday 3 pm - 7 pm

Closed weekends

 

Note that the Bookstore will be closed Thanksgiving Monday, October 14, 2019

External Announcements: Events

Sept 30: Luvell Anderson, Navigating Racial Satire (Perspectives on Ethics)

Navigating Racial Satire

What has to go wrong for racial satire to be racist? In 2014, Stephen Colbert came under fire for a tweet sent out on behalf of his show The Colbert Report. The tweet in question, “I am willing to show @Asian community I care by introducing the Ching-Chong-Ding-Dong Foundation for Sensitivity to Orientals or Whatever,” sparked a twitter response from writer and hashtag activist Suey Park. The tweet was a brief recap of a joke Colbert told on the show as a satirical response to Daniel Snyder’s creation of a charitable organization for Native Americans while continuing to maintain a racial slur for the same group as the name of his football team. We typically think of humor as a non-serious context. These sorts of contexts affect how we interpret utterances. Normally, we don’t interpret humorous utterances as straightforward assertions. In fact, some responses to the charge of racism against Colbert’s satirical performance claimed that recognizing it as satire was enough to exonerate the humor of the charge. But if this is so, what explains when charges of racism against satire persist? In this talk I critically explore candidate views of racist satire. I also draw a distinction between satire that is offensive and satire that is racist

Luvell Anderson       
Syracuse University
Philosophy

04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 2: Elena Comay del Junco, Aristotle and the Ethics of Nature (Ethics@Noon)

Aristotle and the Ethics of Nature

Aristotle holds certain natural beings to have greater or lesser degrees of value or perfection. This raises the question of what ethical entailments such a hierarchy might have.  I argue for three main points: first, that there is no sense in which an ethical approach to the natural world can be straightforwardly derived from Aristotle’s form of natural hierarchy, since it does not entail viewing “lower” species instrumentally. Moreover, such a hierarchy is in fact fully compatible with strict limits on interspecies exploitation. Second, the one passage in which Aristotle seems to ground the exploitation of non-human nature by humans in his natural philosophy conflicts with his larger theoretical commitments. Third and finally, Aristotle himself – even if he is often unclear and self contradictory – provides powerful materials for an ethics of nature.

Elena Comay del Junco       
University of Toronto
Centre for Ethics

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 7: John Basl, Artifact Welfare?: A Problem of Exclusion for Biocentrism (Perspectives on Ethics)

Artifact Welfare?: A Problem of Exclusion for Biocentrism

Biocentrism is the view that all and only living things have moral status or are deserving of direct moral concern. The project of defending Biocentrism includes adopting some strategy for excluding various kinds of things – biotic communities, ecosystems, species, and artifacts – from the domain of direct moral concern. This talk aims to showcase the failures of this strategy of exclusion specifically in the case of artifacts. The standard line for the Biocentrist is to argue that these things fail to meet the conditions for having a welfare or well-being, a necessary condition for having moral status of the relevant kind. The Biocentrist has, for good reason, typically adopted a view of non-sentient welfare that is teleological, grounding the welfare of non-sentient organisms in their goal-directed behaviors, and where pushed to articulate an account of goal-directedness, they have typically appealed to etiological account of function or teleology. When it comes to excluding artifacts, the reason artifacts are taken to lack a welfare is that, while goal-directed, their goal-directedness is derivative on our goals; whereas natural selection grounds genuine teleology, artificial selection does not. I explain why this appeal to natural selection can’t do the work the Biocentrist requires and consider a range of alternatives finding each lacking.

John Basl          
Northeastern University
Philosophy


04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin

Oct 8: John Basl & Jeff Behrends, Why Everyone Has It Wrong About the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles (Ethics of AI in Context)

Why Everyone Has It Wrong About the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles

Many of those thinking about the ethics of autonomous vehicles believe there are important lessons to be learned by attending to so-called Trolley Cases, while a growing opposition is dismissive of their supposed significance. The optimists about the value of these cases think that because AVs might find themselves in circumstances that are similar to Trolley Cases, we can draw on them to ensure ethical driving behavior. The pessimists are convinced that these cases have nothing to teach us, either because they believe that the AV and trolley cases are in fact very dissimilar, or because they are distrustful of the use of thought experiments in ethics generally.
Something has been lost in the moral discourse between the optimists and the pessimists. We too think that we should be pessimistic about the ways optimists have leveraged Trolley Cases to draw conclusions about how to program autonomous vehicles, but the typical defenses of pessimism fail to recognize how the tools of moral philosophy can and should be fruitfully applied to AV design. In this talk we first explain what’s wrong with typical arguments for dismissing the value of trolley cases and then argue that moral philosophers have erred by overlooking the significance of machine learning techniques in AV applications, highlighting how best to proceed.

John Basl       
Northeastern University
Philosophy


Jeff Behrends
       
Harvard University
Philosophy

 

04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 9: Jeff Behrends, Ethics Education in Computer Science: The Embedded EthiCS Approach (Ethics@Noon)

Ethics Education in Computer Science: The Embedded EthiCS Approach

While scholarship on integrating ethical content into Computer Science curricula dates at least to the 1980s, recent moral crises in the tech industry have given rise to a period of intense interest in ethics education for computer scientists, both within academia and among the public at large. There can be little doubt at this point that a responsible education in computer science should equip students with some set of ethical knowledge and skills. But identifying precisely what that set ought to look like, and then designing a feasible curriculum to achieve it, are difficult tasks for a variety of reasons. At Harvard University, the Embedded EthiCS program marries the expertise from the faculty of Computer Science and Philosophy in an attempt to provide meaningful educational outcomes for students without significant investments in time for Computer Science faculty members, or a disruptive restructuring of the Computer Science curriculum. This talk will explain the basic structure of the program, and address its early successes and challenges.

Jeff Behrends       
Harvard University
Philosophy

 

co-sponsor:

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 16: Emma McLure, Microaffirmations, Privilege, and a Duty to Redistribute (Ethics@Noon)

Microaffirmations, Privilege, and a Duty to Redistribute

Microaffirmations are the inverse of microaggressions: seemingly small acknowledgements that can accumulate into large positive impacts. Mary Rowe first proposed microaffirmations as a way for privileged people to consciously counter microaggressions. We could practice giving small supports to members of marginalized groups until these behaviors become habitual and replaced our propensity towards microaggressions.
Recent psychological discussions have uncritically adopted this conceptualization, but I point out the pitfalls of continuing along this path. The current discussion elides the fact that privileged people constantly receive small supports. Indeed, privilege is partially constituted by being the recipient of unceasing microaffirmations. Moreover, the feminist relational autonomy literature has shown that everyone—privileged and marginalized alike—requires social support in order to develop and maintain our autonomous capacities.
Thus, microaffirmations should not be thought of as providing vulnerable members of marginalized groups special treatment that we do not offer to anyone else. Instead, changing our microaffirmative practices would involve ending the special treatment we currently give by default to members of privileged groups. Ultimately, I argue for an imperfect moral duty to redistribute microaffirmations by supporting marginalized people and challenging privileged people’s assumed superiority.

Emma McLure       
University of Toronto
Centre for Ethics

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Centre for Medieval Studies lecture: Barbara H. Rosenwein, “Angry Words, Then and Now”

The Centre for Medieval Studies cordially invites you to a lecture by
 
Barbara H. Rosenwein
Professor emerita, Loyola University, Chicago
 
“Angry Words, Then and Now”
 
 
Thursday, 26 September 2019, 4:10 p.m.
 
Centre for Medieval Studies, Room 310
Lillian Massey Building
125 Queen’s Park

Trained as a medievalist, Barbara H. Rosenwein is a historian of emotions as well.  Her new book, Anger: The Conflicted History of an Emotion, will be out next year.  Tracing the story of anger from the Buddha to Twitter, it provides a much-needed account of our changing and contradictory understandings of that emotion--including our definitions of and responses to angry words.

Toronto Lawyers Association Program: Impaired Driving: The Dawn of a New Era
Event poster

On December 18, 2018 all of the old driving provisions of the Criminal Code were repealed and replaced with a brand-new legislative scheme, modernizing all driving offence provisions.

 

The TLA invites Law School Students to join impaired driving experts Karen Jokinen (defence) and Peter Keen (Crown) as they provide a clear, concise and balanced review of the new provisions, including the reformulated criminal driving offences, the expanded police powers relating to roadside stops, screening and evidentiary demands, and the evidentiary provisions that will now guide the prosecution and defence of these charges.

 

Speakers:

Karen E. Jokinen LL.B., Jokinen Law Professional Corporation, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law

Peter Keen, Assistant Crown Attorney at the Ministry of the Attorney General

 

Moderator:

Danann Hawes, B.A, LL.B, Publisher, Emond Publishing

 

Program details:

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

5:15 – 7:15 p.m. (Registration at 5:00 p.m.)

Toronto Lawyers Association - Lawyers Lounge, 2nd Floor, 361 University Avenue Court House

 

Registration:

https://tlaonline.ca/viewEvent.html?productId=6312

Complimentary tickets are available for Law School Students. Contact Sandra Porter at events@tlaonline.ca

External Announcements: Opportunities

Toronto Lawyers Association Program: Legal Writing for Students and New Lawyers: Writing Effective Memoranda of Law

New lawyers are frequently asked to write memoranda of law for lawyers and/or their clients. The purpose is to answer one or more questions based on a specific set of facts arising from the client’s situation. A memo thoroughly analyses the germane law, applies it to those facts and arrives at a conclusion. The ability to write an effective legal memorandum is an essential skill early in one’s legal career.

 

Of course you know how to write a legal memo. But writing a clear, useful and powerful memo is more challenging and presents an opportunity for you to excel and stand out. The Toronto Lawyers Association invites you to join us and learn how to improve your memo-writing skills in this hands-on program which will include time for Q&A at the conclusion.

 

Speaker:

Neil Guthrie, Director, Professional Development, Research & Knowledge Management, Aird & Berlis LLP, Toronto

 

Program details:

Thursday, October 3, 2019

5:15 – 6:30 p.m. (Registration at 5:00 p.m.)

Toronto Lawyers Association - Lawyers Lounge, 2nd Floor, 361 University Avenue Court House

 

Registration:

https://tlaonline.ca/viewEvent.html?productId=6309

Complimentary tickets are available for Law School Students. Contact Sandra Porter at events@tlaonline.ca

Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (CIAJ) Three-Minute Video Contest

CIAJ’s Three-Minute Video Contest
Law Students Are Invited to Share Their Thought s on a Key Issue

 

In 2020, the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (CIAJ) will host its 45th Annual Conference in Vancouver on “Indigenous Peoples and the Law.” CIAJ wishes to hear the voices of law students on a subject so fundamental to Canadian law and governance.

 

Students are invited to submit a three-minute video to answer the following question: “What will be the most important legal issue for the next generation regarding the relationship between Indigenous Peoples and Canadian institutions?”

 

Participants must present their argument to the camera in the style of the “Three Minute Thesis Competition.” The strongest videos will be presented at CIAJ’s 2019 Annual Conference in Quebec City, October 16–18, 2019. They will also be presented at CIAJ’s 2020 Annual Conference in Vancouver, where the winning video will be incorporated into the Student Panel.

 

Details: https://ciaj-icaj.ca/en/featured-3-minute-video-2019/
Deadline: September 30, 2019

Department of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada 2020 National Essay Challenge

The Department of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is launching the 2020 National Essay Challenge (NEC) to support emerging scholars across Canadian universities in policy-relevant research. The NEC is designed to generate evidence-based insights on IRCC policies. It encourages graduate students to learn more about immigration research and policy, and it raises awareness about the availability of data and supporting resources.

The NEC is open to all disciplines and welcomes empirical research papers related to IRCC's mandate using qualitative or quantitative methodologies. Graduate students with selected essays will be invited to present their research to policy makers in Ottawa (with travel paid) and will receive $500 towards attendance at an academic conference of their choice.

For more information about the NEC, please see the attached poster.

External Announcements: Calls for Papers

"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform", the law journal published through the Faculty of Law at the University of Victoria, is accepting submissions

"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform, the law journal published through the Faculty of Law at the University of Victoria, is accepting submissions for Volume 25, to be published in Spring 2020.

 

The deadline for submissions is October 8, 2019. 

 

Please direct all submissions and inquiries to appeal@uvic.ca, or see uvic.ca/law/jd/appeal/

 

Appeal publishes essays, articles, case commentaries, and book reviews offering insightful commentary on contemporary issues in Canadian and comparative law. Because Appeal is student-run, it primarily publishes student scholarship.

 

Submissions must be sent in Microsoft Word document format, and citations must be footnoted according to the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation, 9th Edition (the "McGill Guide").

 

Submissions may be any length, but a 3,000 to 9,000 word limit is suggested. The Editorial Board will consider the content of a submission and the form of the submission when assessing word limits (book reviews should contain fewer words than essays, as an example). Papers should have been completed while studying at the undergraduate or graduate law student level. 

 

Submissions must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere."

Call for Submissions to the Lakehead Law Journal

The LLJ is a refereed open access academic journal affiliated with the Faculty of Law at Lakehead University. We are currently inviting submissions for both issues of the 2019-2020 academic year. Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2019) seeks articles focused broadly on Indigenous Knowledge, Cultural Heritage, Traditional Knowledge, and Traditional Cultural Expressions and their intersections with Canadian and International law. Vol. 4, Issue 1 (2020) seeks articles broadly focused on Access to Justice in Canada.


Please note that the submission deadline for Volume 3:3 is October 21, 2019 and that the submission deadline for Volume 4:1 is February 3, 2020.


Please find the call for submissions attached in .pdf format. For more information on submissions and journal policies, please visit llj.lakeheadu.ca or email us at lawjournal@lakeheadu.ca.

External Announcements: Other

Review of the University of Toronto Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment: in-person consultations

Open in-person consultations are happening this month on each campus for the Review of the University of Toronto Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment. All of the information can be found online as well as in the following Facebook links:

 

UTM

September 23, 2019 at UTM in the Council Chamber (Davis building, room 3130)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

UTSC

September 24, 2019 at UTSC in the Council Chamber (Arts & Administration building, room 160)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

St. George

September 25, 2019 on the St. George Campus in the Governing Council Chamber (Simcoe Hall, room 214)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

Please note that the online consultation form will remain open until September 30th, 2019.

Black Graduate Students Association Back to School Mixer

The UofT Black Graduate Students Association would like to invite all students, faculty, staff, alumni to our Back to School Mixer. Please the attached flyer. 

It will be an evening of FOOD, MUSIC, GAMES and more. It'll take place on Thursday, September 26, 2019 from 6-9pm at 16 Bancroft Ave

Questions? Contact: bgsa@utoronto.ca.

Late announcements

SLS Financial Aid and Tuition Town Hall

Now that you have received your financial aid assessment and are in the process of paying the remainder of your tuition, the SLS wants to hear from you! We will be hosting a Town Hall in J140 on Monday, September 30 from 12:30-2:00pm. Food (not pizza!) will be provided. We welcome all feedback related to tuition and financial aid. There will be a panel of SLS members from the Financial Aid Dean’s Committee. We will do our best to live stream the event, for maximal accessibility. Minutes will be taken to record feedback. A Google Form will go out for additional feedback after the event.

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J140
Animal Justice Student Club General Meeting

General Meeting this Wednesday @ 12:45 pm in Room P240 (in the Law library)

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 25, 2019, 12:45pm
Location:
P240

Prof. Anita Anand awarded the Yvan Allaire medal by the Royal Society of Canada

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Professor Anita Anand, J.R. Kimber Chair in Investor Protection and Corporate GovernanceProf. Anita Anand, who holds the J.R. Kimber Chair in Investor Protection and Corporate Governance, has been awarded the Yvan Allaire Medal by the Royal Society of Canada.

Headnotes - Sep 16 2019

Announcements

Web Site and Headnotes

Congratulations to the winners of the 1L law buildings scavenger hunt

Scavenger Hunt iconCongratulations to the winners of the 2019 Law Scavenger Hunt for 1Ls! The following participants got all of the answers right and were selected in a random prize draw to win $50 gift certificates for the UofT Bookstore:

  • Henry Dennis
  • Bella Soblirova
  • Elgar Gong
  • Maria Monica Layarda

The Scavenger Hunt is still available to be tried out by any student (and staff and faculty), but there are no longer prizes to be won. Still, it's a great way to explore the law school buildings!

(As a bonus, since there aren't prizes, if you don't get all the answers right you can now try again).

 

Deans' Offices

“Lawyers Doing Cool Things” Alumni Lunches – Fall 2019 line up

“Lawyers Doing Cool Things with Their Law Degrees” is a series of conversations with alumni about their cool jobs, the important issues they are tackling, and how their law degrees got them there. We intentionally focus on alumni who are earlier in their careers and moving the dial on important issues.

Each “Cool Things” alumni speaker will host a lunch for up to 20 students in one of the law school’s classrooms. The law school will supply sandwiches and drinks. Registration is on a first-come-first-served basis.

The Fall 2019 line up includes amazing alumni who are doing cool things with White & Case LLP in NYC, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Toronto Transit Commission, War Child, City of Toronto, and Animal Justice.

On September 18th at 12:30 – 2:00, our first speaker is Jerry Lee (J.D. 2018). Jerry practices corporate law at White & Case LLP in New York City, focusing on technology transactions and mergers and acquisitions. She has worked with clients such as Facebook and Google. She was previously a 1L summer student at Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. In 2017, Jerry was named one of the 54 Next Generation Women Leaders around the world by McKinsey & Company. During law school, Jerry was the Co-President of the Business Law Society, volunteered for the Wills Project, and competed in the Callaghan Memorial Moot. Jerry has a Bachelor of Science from McGill University.

Fall 2019 speaker bios and registration links are here.

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 18, 2019, 12:30pm
Event conditions:
Registration required
Leadership Skills Program: Fall 2019 workshops and Rotman@Law

Leadership Skills Program: Fall 2019 workshops and Rotman@Law

The law school’s Leadership Skills Program (LSP) offers students opportunities to build the key skills and knowledge to succeed in the legal profession. LSP expert-facilitated workshops are interactive, focus on “key take-aways”, and are conveniently held over the lunch hour.

2019-20 workshops include sessions on working in teams, effective communication, conflict management, emotional intelligence, resilience, etc. Click here to sign up for Fall 2019 workshops.

The Rotman @ Law certificate program (continuing in 2019-20) is a collaboration between Rotman and the law school that gives J.D. students access to Rotman’s superb pre-MBA online courses on finance, accounting and statistics.  Click here for more information about how to sign up for R@L courses.

Event conditions:
Registration required
Mindfulness Mondays - Intro to Mindfulness session - Sept 30 at 12:30

Mindfulness Mondays - Intro to Mindfulness Session - Sept 30 at 12:30

The Faculty of Law offers a 6-session mindfulness training program as part of its wellness programming. 

Facilitated by meditation expert Eli Weisbaum, session 1 provides an introduction to mindfulness, an overview of the neuroscience, and time to practice mindfulness skills.

For more information about the mindfulness program at the law school, and to register for this and future sessions, please click here.

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
Flv 223
Event conditions:
Registration required
Lawyers Doing Cool Things - Jerry Lee J.D. 2018, Sept. 18 at 12:30

Lawyers Doing Cool Things - Jerry Lee, J.D. 2018

Jerry practices corporate law at White & Case LLP in New York City, focusing on technology transactions and mergers and acquisitions. She has worked with clients such as Facebook and Google. She was previously a 1L summer student at Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. In 2017, Jerry was named one of the 54 Next Generation Women Leaders around the world by McKinsey & Company. During law school, Jerry was the Co-President of the Business Law Society, volunteered for the Wills Project, and competed in the Callaghan Memorial Moot. Jerry has a Bachelor of Science from McGill University. 

Date and time: Sept. 18, 12:30 

To register, please click here

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 18, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
Flv 223
Event conditions:
Registration required
Lawyers Doing Cool Things, David Forsayeth, J.D. 2011

Lawyers Doing Cool Things - David Forsayeth, J.D. 2011

Dave is the Director, Legal and Corporate Affairs for Flipp Corporation. Flipp is a Toronto-based tech company with over 400 employees that has developed an App and retail technology platform that help North American consumers find value, savings, and deals in their weekly shopping, and helps retailers, consumer packaged goods companies, and quick service restaurants transition their print merchandising to the digital age. Dave has been with Flipp for 3 years, prior to which he was an associate in the Corporate Group at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP  specializing in private M&A.

Date and time: Monday September 30, 12:30

To register, click here

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 12:30pm
Event conditions:
Registration required
Grand Moot: The Constitutionality of Solitary Confinement

Do not miss this year's Grand Moot on Thursday, October 3 in the Moot  Court Room.  Watch four of the law school's most skilled mooters (Eileen Church Carson, Spence Colburn, Julie Lowenstein, and Will Maidment) make submissions on the constitutionality of solitary confinement in front of the Honourable Chief Justice Richard Wagner (Supreme Court of Canada), Chief Justice George Strathy (Ontario Court of Appeal) and Justice Breese Davies (Ontario Superior Court).  Doors open at 4:30 pm.--spillover viewing available in J140!

Date of event:
Thu. Oct. 3, 2019, 5:00pm
Location:
Moot Court Room (Jackman 250)
Wright Lecture: Philip Pettit on The Elusive Sovereign
Philip Pettit

Please attend the Wright Lecture, one of the law school's most important scholarly events of the academic year on Thursday, October 10 beginning at 4:10 pm in Jackman 140.  Professor Pettit will explore whether the idea of sovereignty can find a natural home within a mixed or decentered set of legal arrangements. 

Date of event:
Thu. Oct. 10, 2019, 4:15am
Bleached out: A Race and the Law Discussion Group - Session #1

Bleached out: A Race and the Law Discussion Group - Session #1

The Race and the Law discussion group at the Faculty of Law is devoted to bringing a critical race theory lens to the study, promulgation, and practice of law. This discussion group is offered at a time when the Law Society of Ontario plans to re-consider its diversity statement, when the profession struggles with a lack of diversity, and when access to justice is inversely correlated with race, class and other identifiers.  Bringing an intersectional lens to the study of law, the Race and the Law discussion group will introduce students to foundational texts in critical race studies and their implications for the study and practice of law.  In addition to providing a grounding in the language and analytic framework of critical race studies, the discussion group will also be a venue for racialized students and others to explore openly and in a safe environment the affective challenges that arise in professional cultures that construct professionalism in bleached-out terms. This is a non-credit, co-curricular activity.

Session #1: Thursday September 26th, 12:30 - 2:00

To register for this and other sessions, click here.

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Event conditions:
Registration required
Emerging Issues Workshop Series: Defamation & Harassment in the Age of Social Media

Emerging Issues Workshop Series

Defamation & Harassment in the Age of Social Media

 

 

Wednesday September 25th

12:45-1:45 pm

Jackman Law Building

Room J130

Panelists: Alexi Wood and Jennifer Saville, St. Lawrence Barristers LLP 

 

Please note that lunch will not be served, but you are welcome to bring food & eat during the session.

 Registration is not required, but capacity is limited. 

Come early to avoid disappointment!

Date of event:
Wed. Sep. 25, 2019, 12:45pm
Location:
J130
Event conditions:
First come first served.

Student Office

Become a JD Student Ambassador
Become a JD Ambassador

VOLUNTEER TO BE A JD STUDENT AMBASSADOR

Did you take a law school tour or attend an admissions info event before you were admitted?  

The JD Admissions Office is seeking JD students in all years to volunteer as JD Ambassadors.

Under the direction of the Senior Recruitment, Admissions & Diversity Outreach Officer, JD Ambassadors will engage with prospective students, applicants and newly admitted students to motivate them to enrol in the Faculty.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* BE VALUED & MAKE A DIFFERENCE *
You can have a direct impact on the composition of future classes. Incoming students who have interacted with current JD students and alumni consistently rave about the value of their engagement. 
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* EVERYONE IS ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE*
We seek a mix of Ambassadors in order to support the wide range of educational backgrounds, life experiences and demographics of our prospective students and applicants.  
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* REASONABLE TIME COMMITMENT *
The commitment is quite light enough not to be a strain with other commitments. Allot 4-6 hours per term (typically an average of 1 hr /three weeks) to volunteer. We will work around your personal schedule.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* MAIN DUTIES *

1. LAW SCHOOL TOURS [80%]
Conducting tours that highlight key activities, services, facilities and personnel, and how they relate positively to the student experience. Tour groups range from 1 - 8 people comprising primarily of prospective students, applicants and their relatives/families. Tours are normally 45 min in length, scheduled within the 12:30-2:00 pm period on weekdays. Training will be provided.

2. INFORMATION EVENTS [10%]
Assisting with on-campus and off-campus events, such as Welcome Day, open houses, info sessions and education/career fairs. etc. The majority of events are on weekdays, with possibly 3-5 events held on a weekend day (usually Saturday).

3. E-ENGAGEMENT [10%]
Corresponding with prospective and incoming students via social media, email and live online chats.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

* QUALIFICATIONS *

Candidates must be:
- in ANY JD year of study, from1L to 4L(for combined programs)
- in pursuit of any legal area of interest
- in good academic standing at the Faculty 
- willing and able to be a positive and responsible representative of the Faculty and University

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* SIGN-UP TODAY ONLINE *

To be a new Ambassador
Complete and submit the online application asap at https://forms.gle/zZifRNLfKmSiC4H99


A resume or cover letter is not required, just the completed online form.
The first round of selections will be made from the applications received by September 18

________________________________________________________________________________________________

* HELP *

Jerome Poon-Ting
Senior Recruitment, Admissions & Diversity Outreach Officer
JD Admissions Office
jerome.poon.ting@utoronto.ca

tel: 416-978-3716

Academic Events

Legal History Workshop

The Osgoode Society Legal History Workshop is an informal evening seminar that meets on alternate Wednesdays between September and April to discuss a wide variety of topics in legal history, Canadian and international.  Participants are graduate students and faculty in law and history from U of T, York, McMaster and other institutions, as well as law students and members of the profession.  

Anybody interested in legal history is welcome to attend. If you would like to be put on the e-mail list and to receive the papers and other announcements by e-mail, please e-mail j.phillips@utoronto.ca. The schedule for this term follows.  

All Sessions begin at 6.30. All Sessions except for October 15 in Room J230, Jackman Hall, University of Toronto

Wednesday September 11: Nancy Wright, University of Victoria: “The Laphroaig Leasehold:  Popular Interpretations of Feudal Tenures.”  

Wednesday September 25: Jim Phillips, University of Toronto: ‘The Canadian Court System, 1867-1914’

Tuesday October 15:  Note the Tuesday. Donal Coffey,Max Planck Institute: ‘Newfoundland and Dominion Status.’ Held in Room 223, Flavelle House

Wednesday October 30: Philip Girard, Osgoode Hall Law School: ‘The Contrasting Fates of French-Canadian and Indigenous Constitutionalism: British North America, 1763-1867.’

Wednesday November 6: Eric Adams, University of Alberta: ‘Constitutional Wrongs: A Legal History of Japanese Canadians’

Wednesday November 13: Joseph Kary, Kary and Kwan: Sonderkommando in Canada: Montreal's first World War II War Crimes Trial, 1951-1956

Wednesday November 27: Patricia McMahon, Tory’s: ‘Radioactive: The Life and Lies of Boris Pregel’

 

The James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop: Yariv Brauner

The James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop

Presents:

Yariv Brauner
University of Florida, Levin College of Law

The True Nature of Tax Treaties

Wednesday September 18, 2019
12:30pm - 2pm
Falconer Hall, 84 Queen's Park, Solarium (FA2)

Yariv Brauner is a University of Florida Research Foundation Professor and a Professor of Law with the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida. He joined the Florida faculty in 2006, after teaching at New York University, Northwestern and Arizona State University. He has been a visiting professor and guest speaker at various universities and has participated in many international tax seminars throughout the world. He previously worked as a consultant in Ernst & Young’s international tax practice in New York. Prof. Brauner has published several books and articles in professional journals and law reviews, and is a co-author of U.S. International Taxation – Cases and Materials (with Reuven S. Avi-Yonah and Diane M. Ring).
 
If you would like more information about these workshops, please send an email to events.law@utoronto.ca
Critical Analysis of Law Workshop: Rabia Belt

Critical Analysis of Law Workshop

Presents:

Rabia Belt,
Stanford Law School

Outcasts from the Vote: Woman Suffrage and Mental Disability in the Long Nineteenth Century United States

Tuesday September 17, 2019 
12:30pm - 2pm
Falconer Hall, 84 Queen's Park,
Solarium, FA2

Rabia Belt is a legal historian whose scholarship focuses on disability and citizenship. Her scholarship ranges from cultural analysis of disability in media, to contemporary issues facing voters with disability, to the historical treatment of disabled Americans. She is currently writing a book titled, “Disabling Democracy in America: Disability, Citizenship, Suffrage, and the Law, 1819-1920.” In 2015, the American Society of Legal History named her a Kathryn T. Preyer Scholar for her paper, “Ballots for Bullets? The Disenfranchisement of Civil War Veterans.” Professor Belt is also an advocate for people with disabilities. In 2016, President Obama named her as a Councilmember to the National Council on Disability, the independent federal agency that advises the President, Congress, and other federal agencies regarding policies and practices that affect people with disabilities. Additionally, she serves as a member of the Board of Directors for the Disability Rights Bar Association. Prior to joining the Stanford Law faculty, she was a Visiting Assistant Professor and Research Academic Fellow at Georgetown University Law Center. Earlier in her career, she was a summer associate at Preston, Gates & Ellis, LLP, a parliamentary intern with the South African Human Rights Commission, and a research intern at the Office of the Monitor for Pigford v. Glickman & Brewington v. Glickman. She received her JD from the University of Michigan Law School in 2009 and her PhD in American Studies from the University of Michigan in 2015.

If you would like more information about these workshops, please send an email to events.law@utoronto.ca

Justice Ian Binnie Lecture - “Fire and Fury in the Courtroom”

Date:  Monday, October 7, 2019

Time:  12:30 – 2:00 pm

Location: J140

 

Former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie will address law students and faculty.

 

All law students and faculty are welcome. 

 

Please RSVP to associatedean.law@utoronto.ca

Student Activities

ILS Presents: 1L Summers in International Law

It's never too early to start thinking about how to spend your 1L summer! Join the International Law Society on Thursday, September 26th at 12:30 in J130 to hear from current upper year students about their experiences at the United Nations, Permanent Court of Arbitration, and International Criminal Court, to name a few. Lunch will be served.

Thursday, September 26th

12:30-2:00 PM

J130

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J130
SLS Fall Elections
The Students’ Law Society (SLS) is running elections to fill the following positions for the 2019-2020 academic year:

Social Affairs
1L Rep – three (3) positions
3L Rep – three (3) positions
 
Student Affairs and Governance (StAG)
1L Rep – four (4) positions
2L Rep – one (1) positions
3L Rep – one (1) position
 
University of Toronto Students' Union St. George Campus (UTSU)
UTSU Rep – one (1) position

Below is the timeline for the elections:
Wed. Sept. 4: Nomination period opens at 10:00am.
Wed. Sept. 11: Nomination period closes and candidate statements due to CRO (elections.sls@gmail.com) by 11:59pm. 
Thurs. Sept. 12: Campaign period opens at 10:00am. Candidate statements published via list-serv. 
Tues. Sept. 17: Candidates’ forum occurs at 12:30pm. Location to be announced.
Tues. Sept. 17: Online voting opens at 5:00pm.
Thurs. Sept. 19: Online voting closes at 5:00pm. Results published via list-serv shortly after.

HOW TO APPLY FOR A POSITION
Candidates may nominate themselves by emailing a statement of no more than 150 words with the subject line “SLS Election Nomination [Candidate’s name]”. Statements are due by Wednesday, September 11th at 11:59 PM EST to elections.sls@gmail.comStatements received after this time will not be accepted. Candidates’ statements will then be distributed in a list-serv email.

The SLS has prescribed rules on campaigning, which shall be strictly enforced by the CRO, and can be found in SLS By-Law 500. The SLS By-Laws can be found on the SLS website hereNominees must provide the CRO with a signed copy of By-Law 500 acknowledging that they have read and agree to adhere to the By-Law. Please email a signed copy to the CRO or return the signed copy to the SLS office. If no one is in the office at the time you drop it off, please slide it under the door. 

Voting will take place online. Information on voting will be distributed prior to the voting date.

Note that successful candidates will need to attend the SLS Retreat on Saturday, September 28th for orientation and training.

More information about the SLS can be found here. If you have any questions regarding elections, please contact the CRO at elections.sls@gmail.com.
iTrek Israel Trip Info Session

Come to Israel with your fellow U of T Law students on iTrek!

iTrek is a highly subsidized 7 day trip to Israel from May 2 - May 9 open to all U of T Law students. Over the course of the trip we will explore Israel’s cultural landscape, legal environment, nightlife, high-tech industry, history, and politics. All led by your fellow law students! Come out to the info session to learn more.

Date: Thursday, September 26
Time: 12:30 – 2:00pm 
Location: J125

Dark Money: Elections, Nonprofits, and Voter Manipulation

During the last US election, a small network of billionaires spent over $1 billion to push their issues. They used networks of nonprofits and charities to mask their identities, purposes, and create the false impression of an independent grassroots movement advocating for their interests. Join the Charity Law Interest Group as it presents original research evaluating the exposure of Canada's charity, nonprofit, and electoral laws to this type of abuse.

Date: Monday, September 16, 2019
Time: 12:30pm to 2:00pm
Location:  FA3 (Falconer Hall)

For more information email utcharitylaw@gmail.com

To RSVP on Facebook go to: https://www.facebook.com/events/384767785553258/

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 16, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
Falconer Hall Fa3
Call for Out in Law 1L Reps!
Hi 1L friends! Out in Law is looking for 2-3 1L Reps to join our executive team! Out in Law is a group for LGBTQ2S+ students at UofT Law. 1L Reps would assist with planning social and academic events as necessary and act as a liaison to the first year class.
 
If you are interested, please send a max 150 word statement of interest to outinlaw.universityoftoronto@gmail.com by Friday, September 20 at 5:00pm. Feel free to reach out to Lauren Wildgoose or Robert Nanni if you have any questions!
Sign up for First Generation Network!

If you are a first generation student,* please fill out this link to ensure you receive all communications about social events, networking, and mentorship from the First Generation Network:
https://firstgennetwork.typeform.com/to/elLbXI

*Typically “first generation” means that you’re the first person in your family to attend post-secondary education, but use your discretion. If your parents attended post-secondary education but never used their degree in a related way, you could justify being part of the network. Please contact Robert Nanni if you have any questions.

Forum: Fighting Fake News then and now – lessons from a watershed moment for Chinese Canadians 40 years ago

In partnership with the Asia Law Students Society, International Human Rights Program (IHRP), and Osler, we invite you to join our forum marking the 40th Anniversary of the Anti-W5 campaign. On September 30, 1979, CTV broadcasted a program depicting Chinese Canadian students on University of Toronto campus as “foreigners”. This led to the creation of the Chinese Canadian National Council (CCNC) and its later campaigns, including the Head Tax redress movement. While we celebrate and take lessons learned from Chinese Canadian progressive movements in the past 40 years, we continue to challenge and fight racism today.

Event Description and Registration:

https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/fighting-fake-news-then-and-now-lessons-from-a-watershed-moment-for-chinese-canadians-40-years-ago-tickets-70795795129

Date and Location

Monday, September 30th from 7-9 pm at the Jackman Building P105, 78 Queens Park, Toronto, Ontario

Organizer:

Chinese Canadian National Council for Social Justice (CCNCSJ)

Co-Sponsors:

Asia Law Students Society, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

International Human Rights Program (IHRP), University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Agenda:

7:00 p.m. Interviews with panel of speakers

7:45 p.m. Dialogues with audience

8:30 p.m. Mingling over coffee and snacks

Facilitators:

Ryan Chan, President, Asia Law Students Society

Susan Eng, Senior Fellow, Advocacy for the National Institute on Aging

Speakers:

Dr. Alan Tai-Wai Li, Past President, CCNC

Lilian Ma, Founding Director, CCNC

Vincent Wong, Adjunct Professor and Research Associate, IHRP

 

Date of event:
Mon. Sep. 30, 2019, 7:00am
Location:
Jackman Law Building P105
Environmental Law Club Executive Hiring

The Environmental Law Club is conducting our Executive Team Hiring!

We are looking for a few 1L and Upper Year Executive Reps to join the ELC Executive Team. Our representatives are expected to help out with planning and promoting our various events. Getting involved as a representative gives you more opportunities to interact with professionals in the environmental law field. We work to engage law students with issues in environmental law.

If you are interested in applying, please send an email to utenvirolawclub@gmail.com with a short statement of interest (approximately 200 words) by Friday, September 20th at 5PM.

SLS Clothing Sales
Images of Faculty of Law clothing options

Hey Everyone! If you’re in search of U of T law-branded clothing to show off to your friends and family, looking for a personalized gift, or just hoping to stay warm during the next polar vortex - look no further, SLS has you covered!! 

We're selling U of T Law branded apparel with a wider variety of styles and colours than currently offered at the bookstore. Take a look at the apparel and place an order through our e-store website: https://www.uoftfacultyoflaw-webstore.com

The e-store officially opens today and closes on October 15th. All clothing orders will be delivered to the law school by November 8th. Order your clothing before its too late!

Best,

SLS Social Committee

Life as a Tax Lawyer

On Thursday, September 26 from 12:30-2:00 at P120, the University of Toronto Tax Law Society will be hosting a panel of tax practitioners. This is a great networking opportunity for those interested in tax and corporate law or for those who want to learn more about the different career paths available in tax! Free food will be provided.

Speakers:
Lara Friedlander - CIBC, Vice-President, Tax Planning and Advisory
Patrick Marley - Osler, Partner
Jacob Yau - Dentons, Associate
Kim Wharram - CRA, Senior Rulings Officer

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 26, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
P120
China Law Group Recruitment 2019-2020

What implications do China's Social Credit System have for privacy and human rights for its 1.4 billion citizens? How will China’s retaliation of tariffs on American imports impact international trade law and the World Trade Organization? What does China's reaction to the Hong Kong Protests mean in terms of its relationship with Hong Kong and the world at large?

The China Law Group meets to discuss our shared curiosity in answers to those questions and many more. No prior knowledge of China law is needed- we are all here to learn about the China law to make up for an area that the law school is grossly lacking in. We will organize a reading group and/or a working group on contemporary issues facing the Chinese legal system. For the more career minded folks: Many law firms have a China law practice group to respond to the growing importance China is playing in global markets. Learning more about China law may or may not increase employability***

As well, the group organizes an annual conference held in the winter term that draws together academics and practitioners from around North America who engage with China and Chinese law. Members will also assist in organizing the conference such as proposing panel discussion topics and assisting with logistics.

If China or Chinese law interests you, please send a brief statement of interest to anju.xing@mail.utoronto.ca by Friday, September 20 at 11:59PM. Bonus points for including a (royalty-free) image of China. Academic exposure to China is an asset, but is not required. 

***The CLG assumes no liability for your future job prospects. But aren’t you interested to see whether tort law in China allow your lawsuit to be successful?

Centres, Legal Clinics, and Special Programs

LAWS Volunteer Training
Law in Action Within Schools

All new LAWS volunteers must attend a mandatory training session on Thursday September 19, 2019 from 12:30 - 2:00pm in J140. Lunch will be provided.

Law students interested in volunteering for LAWS can sign up at www.lawinaction.ca

The application deadline is Friday September 13 at 12:00pm.  

Date of event:
Thu. Sep. 19, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J140
Oct 2: Asper Centre Constitutional Roundtable with Prof Brandon Garrett of Duke University School of Law

“Wealth, Equal Protection and Due Process” – A Constitutional Roundtable with Professor Brandon Garrett

With UTLaw's Associate Professor Vincent Chiao as Discussant

October 2 @ 12:30 pm - 2:00 pm in Jackman J125

On Wednesday October 2, 2019 Professor Brandon Garrett will present a Constitutional Roundtable titled “Wealth, Equal Protection and Due Process” based on his recently published paper. Professor Garrett joined the Duke University School of Law faculty in 2018 as the inaugural L. Neil Williams, Jr. Professor of Law. A leading scholar of criminal justice outcomes, evidence, and constitutional rights, Garrett previously was the White Burkett Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs and Justice Thurgood Marshall Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia.

Professor Brandon Garrett’s current research and teaching interests focus on forensic science, eyewitness identification, corporate crime, constitutional rights and habeas corpus, and criminal justice policy. His work has been widely cited by courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, lower federal courts, state supreme courts, and courts in other countries, such as the Supreme Courts of Canada and Israel. Garrett also frequently speaks about criminal justice matters before legislative and policy making bodies, groups of practicing lawyers, law enforcement, and to local and national media. He is involved with a number of law reform initiatives, including the American Law Institute’s project on policing, for which he serves as Associate Reporter.

Professor Vincent Chiao, B.A. (University of Virginia), Ph.D. (Northwestern), J.D. (Harvard), researches and teaches primarily in the area of criminal law and criminal justice, with a particular interest in the philosophical examination of its doctrine and institutions. He is the author of Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State (Oxford University Press 2018). He is also responsible for overseeing the Faculty of Law's appellate criminal law externship, which provides selected third year JD students with the opportunity to work directly on criminal appeals, including before the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada.

ABSTRACT: Increasingly, constitutional litigation challenging wealth inequality focuses on the intersection of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. That intersection—between equality and due process—deserves far more careful exploration. What I call “equal process” claims arise from a line of Supreme Court and lower court cases in which wealth inequality is the central concern. For example, the Supreme Court in Bearden v. Georgia conducted analysis of a claim that criminal defendants were treated differently based on wealth in which due process and equal protection principles converged. That equal process connection is at the forefront of a wave of national litigation concerning some of the most pressing civil rights issues of our time, including:the constitutionality of fines, fees, and costs; detention of immigrants and criminal defendants for inability to pay cash bail; loss of voting rights; and a host of other ways in which the indigent face both unfair process and disparate burdens. I argue that an intersectional “equal process” approach to these cases better reflects both longstanding constitutional doctrine and the practical stakes in such litigation. If courts properly understand this connection between inequality and unfair process, they will design more suitable and effective remedies. More broadly, scholars have bemoaned how the Court turned away from class based heightened scrutiny in equal protection doctrine. Equal process theory has the potential to reinvigorate the Fourteenth Amendment as a guardian against unfair process and discrimination that increases inequality in society.

Please email tal.schreier@utoronto.ca for further information.

Light lunch will be provided

Date of event:
Wed. Oct. 2, 2019, 12:30pm
Location:
J125 Jackman Law building

Career Development Office and Employment Opportunities

Faculty Research Assistants (Library RA Pool)

Job Title:  Faculty Research Assistant (Library RA Pool)
Status:  Casual
Hours:  Up to 8 hours max. per week during school year
Salary:  $16/hr
Reports To:  Reference and Research Librarian
Applications Accepted Until: Friday, September 20, 2019

Please see the attached job description for more information and instructions on how to apply.

The Faculty’s graduate program is currently recruiting for 14 work study positions,

Graduate Programs

The Faculty’s graduate program is currently recruiting for 14 work study positions, including positions which support:

  • course development and research;
  • IT and classroom technology;
  • recruitment and admissions;
  • career mentoring;
  • and more

 

All postings are available on UTLawCareers. 

Financial Aid, Scholarships, and Awards

Private Law Writing Prize

Dear Students,

I am writing to draw your attention to a new Private Law Writing Prize. This is an exciting initiative (made possible by an anonymous donor) to promote and recognize student scholarship. Please consider submitting a paper this year! I personally look forward to reading your work. Details are below.

Best wishes,

Larissa Katz

-----------------------------

The Private Law Writing Prize is awarded for the best student paper on a topic in private law. The competition is open to J.D. students currently enrolled at the University of Toronto. Prize-winning papers will be published on the U of T Law’s law and philosophy webpage. Prize-winning papers will also be awarded an honorarium of $250.

To be eligible for consideration, the paper must be written during the current academic year in conjunction with a course or directed research project at the Faculty of Law.  Students should include a brief abstract along with he paper. Papers must not exceed 30 pages, double-spaced (Times New Roman, 12 point font). Papers must be submitted to Larissa Katz at larissa.katz@utoronto.ca by April 24, 2020.

Journals, Research, and Scholarship

Journal of Law & Equality - Call for Submissions

Journal of Law & Equality: Call for Submissions (Suggested Deadline: September 20, 2019)

The Journal of Law & Equality (JLE) is a peer-reviewed journal at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law. We aim to promote critical and informed debate on equality issues, with special emphasis on the Canadian context. The JLE publishes peer-reviewed full-length articles, case comments, notes, and book reviews by professors, judges, practitioners, and students across Canada.

 Though we accept submissions on a rolling basis, we encourage you to submit by September 20, 2019 to ensure publication, if accepted, in this academic year. 

 To make a submission, please visit our online submissions system at https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/utjle/index. To contact us, please email jle.editor@utoronto.ca.

-- 

Angela Hou and Amit Singh
Editors-in-Chief, 2019-2020
Journal of Law & Equality

Website: https://jle.law.utoronto.ca
Submissions: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/utjle/index

 

The Indigenous Law Journal: Become an Associate Editor!

The Indigenous Law Journal is a student-run legal journal.  It is the first and only Canadian legal journal to exclusively publish articles regarding Indigenous legal issues.  We are dedicated to developing dialogue and scholarship in the field of Indigenous legal issues both in Canada and internationally. Our central concerns are Indigenous legal systems and legal systems as they affect Indigenous peoples

All law students are invited to be involved with the Indigenous Law Journal as Associate Editors.  If you are interested in being part of the Indigenous Law Journal, please fill out the online form below:

https://forms.gle/7wMNvCgFSHg8UXkNA

Our Information and Training Session for incoming Associate Editors will be on Monday, September 16th at 12:30-2:00 in J125.

Please contact Olivia Hodson and Daniel Diamond, Editors-in-Chief, at indiglaw.journal@utoronto.ca with any questions.

Bora Laskin Law Library

Westlaw and Quicklaw Training

We have booked training for the WestlawNextCanada and LexisAdvance Quicklaw databases on the following dates and times

 

 

The waitlist option has been enabled so if you are unable to get tickets for these sessions please put your name on the waitlist and if required we will set up additional session.

 

Any Questions – please contact me at susan.barker@utoronto.ca

 

Susan Barker
Digital and Reference Services Librarian

Bora Laskin Law Library

University of Toronto

Bookstore

Bookstore Fall Extended Hours

Bookstore Extended Hours for Back-to-School

August 19-31: Monday-Friday 11 am - 5 pm

Sept 1-14: Monday-Thursday 9 am - 5 pm, Friday 11 am - 7 pm

Sept 15-28: Monday-Thursday 10 am - 4 pm, Friday 3 pm - 7 pm

 

 

Come for the books, and as a bonus find Law swag, study necessities, and friendly staff!

Back to School Savings!

Back to School Savings

Save on selected items including:

  • printers
  • U of T single subject notebooks
  • Essentials U of T ball caps
  • Dudley carded locks
  • lined paper (3-hole punched)

Find textbooks and more at the Law Bookstore

Study in Style

Study in (Law) Style

Pick up comfortable and stylish U of T Law clothing and

Study in Style!

Check out our exclusive U of T Law sweaters

plus, SAVE on U of T wear:

  • U of T Essentials Sweatpants are $10 off until Sept 28

  • U of T Essentials Ball Cap is $5 off until Sept 28

 

External Announcements: Events

Sept 17: Teresa Heffernan, The Ethical Imagination: Humanities versus Artificial Intelligence (Ethics of AI in Context)

The Ethical Imagination: Humanities versus Artificial Intelligence

The era of “disruptive” technologies has given way to an ethical quagmire. Biased algorithms, invasive facial recognition software, proprietary black boxes, the theft and monetization of personal data, and the proliferation of hate-spewing bots and deepfakes have undermined democracy. Killer robots and the automation of war have led to a new arms raise with Vladimir Putin declaring whoever leads in AI will rule the world. The concentration of wealth and power of corporations that own most of this resource-intensive technology and the environmental price tag of AI can only hasten climate change. In response to these ethical problems, a number of research centres are now investing in the intersection of humanities and AI in order to study its impact on society, notably the Schwarzman College for Computing at MIT, the Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society at the University of Toronto, and The Schwarzman Centre’s Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford. An article about the MIT initiative noted: “The approach has the potential not just to diversify tech but to help ‘techify’ everything else” while Geoffrey Hinton said: “My hope is that the Schwartz Reisman Institute will be the place where deep learning disrupts the humanities.” What these statements disavow, however, are the very different epistemological approaches that structure these fields. If we are to begin to deal with the ethical issues of AI, the humanities should not be “disrupted” and made to bow to the logic of big data, algorithms, and machines. In this talk, I will argue that it is only by keeping alive the tensions between artificial intelligence and the humanities that we can hope to have an informed debate about the limits and possibilities of this technology.

Teresa Heffernan         
St. Mary’s University
English

04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Sept 18: Jill Ross, Horatian Poetics and Moral Theory in the Middle Ages (Ethics@Noon)

Horatian Poetics and Moral Theory in the Middle Ages

One of the animating doctrines of medieval poetic theory is the avoidance of poetic error. Based on the first 37 lines of Horace’s Art of Poetry where the poet counsels against inept, monstrous composition, medieval commentators created a system of 6 poetic errors that became a canonical element in the teaching of poetic technique in the standard artes poetriae of Geoffrey of Vinsauf and Matthew of Vendôme. The term used to refer to these poetic errors, vitia, carries with it a moral, ethical charge, with poetry placed firmly under the philosophical rubric of ethics. While this prescriptive system of avoiding poetic vice is a theoretical topos, what is less clear is how poets chose to intervene in such a fixed system. In this paper, I will use a case study of Juan Ruiz, a fourteenth-century Castilian poet who turns these poetic errors inside out in the process of narrating the moral, sexual sins of his protagonist whose unsuccessful efforts at seduction mirror the aesthetic lapses of the text itself. The poetic text of the Libro de buen amor (Book of Good Love) deliberately commits every aesthetic error condemned by Horace and his medieval readers in a poem that self-reflexively blurs the boundaries between poetics and ethics. I will then explore, through a sampling of commentary on Horace’s Ars Poetica, spanning the 12th to the 15th centuries, how and why the writing of poetry may constitute an ethical act. By placing the Horatian material in conversation with both Aristotelian ethics and the large Christian literature on sin, this paper will explore some possible avenues for theorizing and defining the kind of moral lapse that some commentators attributed to faulty poetic composition.

Jill Ross       
University of Toronto
Comparative Literature and Medieval Studies

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin

Sept 30: Luvell Anderson, Navigating Racial Satire (Perspectives on Ethics)

Navigating Racial Satire

What has to go wrong for racial satire to be racist? In 2014, Stephen Colbert came under fire for a tweet sent out on behalf of his show The Colbert Report. The tweet in question, “I am willing to show @Asian community I care by introducing the Ching-Chong-Ding-Dong Foundation for Sensitivity to Orientals or Whatever,” sparked a twitter response from writer and hashtag activist Suey Park. The tweet was a brief recap of a joke Colbert told on the show as a satirical response to Daniel Snyder’s creation of a charitable organization for Native Americans while continuing to maintain a racial slur for the same group as the name of his football team. We typically think of humor as a non-serious context. These sorts of contexts affect how we interpret utterances. Normally, we don’t interpret humorous utterances as straightforward assertions. In fact, some responses to the charge of racism against Colbert’s satirical performance claimed that recognizing it as satire was enough to exonerate the humor of the charge. But if this is so, what explains when charges of racism against satire persist? In this talk I critically explore candidate views of racist satire. I also draw a distinction between satire that is offensive and satire that is racist

Luvell Anderson       
Syracuse University
Philosophy

04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 2: Elena Comay del Junco, Aristotle and the Ethics of Nature (Ethics@Noon)

Aristotle and the Ethics of Nature

Aristotle holds certain natural beings to have greater or lesser degrees of value or perfection. This raises the question of what ethical entailments such a hierarchy might have.  I argue for three main points: first, that there is no sense in which an ethical approach to the natural world can be straightforwardly derived from Aristotle’s form of natural hierarchy, since it does not entail viewing “lower” species instrumentally. Moreover, such a hierarchy is in fact fully compatible with strict limits on interspecies exploitation. Second, the one passage in which Aristotle seems to ground the exploitation of non-human nature by humans in his natural philosophy conflicts with his larger theoretical commitments. Third and finally, Aristotle himself – even if he is often unclear and self contradictory – provides powerful materials for an ethics of nature.

Elena Comay del Junco       
University of Toronto
Centre for Ethics

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 7: John Basl, Artifact Welfare?: A Problem of Exclusion for Biocentrism (Perspectives on Ethics)

Artifact Welfare?: A Problem of Exclusion for Biocentrism

Biocentrism is the view that all and only living things have moral status or are deserving of direct moral concern. The project of defending Biocentrism includes adopting some strategy for excluding various kinds of things – biotic communities, ecosystems, species, and artifacts – from the domain of direct moral concern. This talk aims to showcase the failures of this strategy of exclusion specifically in the case of artifacts. The standard line for the Biocentrist is to argue that these things fail to meet the conditions for having a welfare or well-being, a necessary condition for having moral status of the relevant kind. The Biocentrist has, for good reason, typically adopted a view of non-sentient welfare that is teleological, grounding the welfare of non-sentient organisms in their goal-directed behaviors, and where pushed to articulate an account of goal-directedness, they have typically appealed to etiological account of function or teleology. When it comes to excluding artifacts, the reason artifacts are taken to lack a welfare is that, while goal-directed, their goal-directedness is derivative on our goals; whereas natural selection grounds genuine teleology, artificial selection does not. I explain why this appeal to natural selection can’t do the work the Biocentrist requires and consider a range of alternatives finding each lacking.

John Basl          
Northeastern University
Philosophy


04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin

Oct 8: John Basl & Jeff Behrends, Why Everyone Has It Wrong About the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles (Ethics of AI in Context)

Why Everyone Has It Wrong About the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles

Many of those thinking about the ethics of autonomous vehicles believe there are important lessons to be learned by attending to so-called Trolley Cases, while a growing opposition is dismissive of their supposed significance. The optimists about the value of these cases think that because AVs might find themselves in circumstances that are similar to Trolley Cases, we can draw on them to ensure ethical driving behavior. The pessimists are convinced that these cases have nothing to teach us, either because they believe that the AV and trolley cases are in fact very dissimilar, or because they are distrustful of the use of thought experiments in ethics generally.
Something has been lost in the moral discourse between the optimists and the pessimists. We too think that we should be pessimistic about the ways optimists have leveraged Trolley Cases to draw conclusions about how to program autonomous vehicles, but the typical defenses of pessimism fail to recognize how the tools of moral philosophy can and should be fruitfully applied to AV design. In this talk we first explain what’s wrong with typical arguments for dismissing the value of trolley cases and then argue that moral philosophers have erred by overlooking the significance of machine learning techniques in AV applications, highlighting how best to proceed.

John Basl       
Northeastern University
Philosophy


Jeff Behrends
       
Harvard University
Philosophy

 

04:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 9: Jeff Behrends, Ethics Education in Computer Science: The Embedded EthiCS Approach (Ethics@Noon)

Ethics Education in Computer Science: The Embedded EthiCS Approach

While scholarship on integrating ethical content into Computer Science curricula dates at least to the 1980s, recent moral crises in the tech industry have given rise to a period of intense interest in ethics education for computer scientists, both within academia and among the public at large. There can be little doubt at this point that a responsible education in computer science should equip students with some set of ethical knowledge and skills. But identifying precisely what that set ought to look like, and then designing a feasible curriculum to achieve it, are difficult tasks for a variety of reasons. At Harvard University, the Embedded EthiCS program marries the expertise from the faculty of Computer Science and Philosophy in an attempt to provide meaningful educational outcomes for students without significant investments in time for Computer Science faculty members, or a disruptive restructuring of the Computer Science curriculum. This talk will explain the basic structure of the program, and address its early successes and challenges.

Jeff Behrends       
Harvard University
Philosophy

 

co-sponsor:

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Oct 16: Emma McLure, Microaffirmations, Privilege, and a Duty to Redistribute (Ethics@Noon)

Microaffirmations, Privilege, and a Duty to Redistribute

Microaffirmations are the inverse of microaggressions: seemingly small acknowledgements that can accumulate into large positive impacts. Mary Rowe first proposed microaffirmations as a way for privileged people to consciously counter microaggressions. We could practice giving small supports to members of marginalized groups until these behaviors become habitual and replaced our propensity towards microaggressions.
Recent psychological discussions have uncritically adopted this conceptualization, but I point out the pitfalls of continuing along this path. The current discussion elides the fact that privileged people constantly receive small supports. Indeed, privilege is partially constituted by being the recipient of unceasing microaffirmations. Moreover, the feminist relational autonomy literature has shown that everyone—privileged and marginalized alike—requires social support in order to develop and maintain our autonomous capacities.
Thus, microaffirmations should not be thought of as providing vulnerable members of marginalized groups special treatment that we do not offer to anyone else. Instead, changing our microaffirmative practices would involve ending the special treatment we currently give by default to members of privileged groups. Ultimately, I argue for an imperfect moral duty to redistribute microaffirmations by supporting marginalized people and challenging privileged people’s assumed superiority.

Emma McLure       
University of Toronto
Centre for Ethics

12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto
200 Larkin 

Aboriginal Justice Conference Invitation: Indigenous Law Across Landscapes (free for law students)

Boozhoo! Aaniin! Wachay!

 

Lakehead University’s Bora Laskin Faculty of Law is proud to be hosting a conference for Canadian law students titled, 'Indigenous Law Across Landscapes: Languages, Land, and New Directions.'

 

The one-day conference will take place on Friday, November 15, 2019, in Thunder Bay, Ontario, at the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law (PACI Building, 401 Red River Road). The conference is geared specifically towards law students. It promises to foster fruitful discussion of Indigenous Law issues. Not only will the conference offer a chance to intellectually engage with these important topics, but it is also an excellent opportunity to visit Thunder Bay and to meet and collaborate with other Canadian law students.

 

Health breaks and lunch will be provided. Additional, optional events are scheduled for the evening of November 14 and the morning of November 16. We are in the process of finalizing the agenda and hope to share our listing of panels and speakers soon.

 

Registration is free for all Canadian law students and is open now - follow the link HERE

 

Please note that spaces are limited. We will monitor the registrations closely and advise if / when capacity has been reached and inform any students who may be placed on a waitlist. Please note that student attendees will be given opportunities to share knowledge and insights with their peers after the conference.

 

Attached to this email, please find an invitation from Director of Indigenous Relations, Robin Sutherland, including information about registration and travel assistance. Also attached, please find a save the date poster.

 

Miigwetch! We look forward to welcoming you to the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law!

 

Justis Danto-Clancy

Panel Discussion: Justice in an Age of Global Politics - The Case of Unit 731

Unit 731 was the codename for the Japanese Imperial Army’s biochemical warfare experimentation center located in China during the Asia-Pacific War. As a part of the forgotten history of WWII in Asia, and often characterized as the “Auschwitz of the East,” Unit 731 was the site of countless medical atrocities including human experimentation and field experimentation of biochemical weapons. Unlike in postwar Germany, perpetrators escaped legal punishment in post-war trials. This panel will discuss crucial issues surrounding the history of Unit 731, the American government’s cover-up of Unit 731 war crimes after the war, and how politics and justice interacted to shape war memory during the Cold War and beyond.

 

Panelists

Professor Takashi Fujitani – Asian Institute, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto

Professor Yang Yanjun – Director, Unit 731 Research Center in Harbin, China

Dr. Gong Zhiwei – Shanghai Jiaotong University, China

Professor Katsuo Nishiyama – Professor Emeritus, Shiga University of Medical Science, Japan

 

Date: Friday, September 20th, 2019

Time: 10am-12pm

Location: Robarts Library, Blackburn Room (4th Floor)

 

Please RSVP: info@alphaeducation.org

Date of event:
Fri. Sep. 20, 2019, 10:00am
Location:
Robarts Library Blackburn Room (Floor 4)
Event conditions:
RSVP required
Centre for Medieval Studies lecture: Barbara H. Rosenwein, “Angry Words, Then and Now”

The Centre for Medieval Studies cordially invites you to a lecture by
 
Barbara H. Rosenwein
Professor emerita, Loyola University, Chicago
 
“Angry Words, Then and Now”
 
 
Thursday, 26 September 2019, 4:10 p.m.
 
Centre for Medieval Studies, Room 310
Lillian Massey Building
125 Queen’s Park

Trained as a medievalist, Barbara H. Rosenwein is a historian of emotions as well.  Her new book, Anger: The Conflicted History of an Emotion, will be out next year.  Tracing the story of anger from the Buddha to Twitter, it provides a much-needed account of our changing and contradictory understandings of that emotion--including our definitions of and responses to angry words.

Toronto Lawyers Association Program: Impaired Driving: The Dawn of a New Era
Event poster

On December 18, 2018 all of the old driving provisions of the Criminal Code were repealed and replaced with a brand-new legislative scheme, modernizing all driving offence provisions.

 

The TLA invites Law School Students to join impaired driving experts Karen Jokinen (defence) and Peter Keen (Crown) as they provide a clear, concise and balanced review of the new provisions, including the reformulated criminal driving offences, the expanded police powers relating to roadside stops, screening and evidentiary demands, and the evidentiary provisions that will now guide the prosecution and defence of these charges.

 

Speakers:

Karen E. Jokinen LL.B., Jokinen Law Professional Corporation, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law

Peter Keen, Assistant Crown Attorney at the Ministry of the Attorney General

 

Moderator:

Danann Hawes, B.A, LL.B, Publisher, Emond Publishing

 

Program details:

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

5:15 – 7:15 p.m. (Registration at 5:00 p.m.)

Toronto Lawyers Association - Lawyers Lounge, 2nd Floor, 361 University Avenue Court House

 

Registration:

https://tlaonline.ca/viewEvent.html?productId=6312

Complimentary tickets are available for Law School Students. Contact Sandra Porter at events@tlaonline.ca

External Announcements: Opportunities

Toronto Lawyers Association Program: Legal Writing for Students and New Lawyers: Writing Effective Memoranda of Law

New lawyers are frequently asked to write memoranda of law for lawyers and/or their clients. The purpose is to answer one or more questions based on a specific set of facts arising from the client’s situation. A memo thoroughly analyses the germane law, applies it to those facts and arrives at a conclusion. The ability to write an effective legal memorandum is an essential skill early in one’s legal career.

 

Of course you know how to write a legal memo. But writing a clear, useful and powerful memo is more challenging and presents an opportunity for you to excel and stand out. The Toronto Lawyers Association invites you to join us and learn how to improve your memo-writing skills in this hands-on program which will include time for Q&A at the conclusion.

 

Speaker:

Neil Guthrie, Director, Professional Development, Research & Knowledge Management, Aird & Berlis LLP, Toronto

 

Program details:

Thursday, October 3, 2019

5:15 – 6:30 p.m. (Registration at 5:00 p.m.)

Toronto Lawyers Association - Lawyers Lounge, 2nd Floor, 361 University Avenue Court House

 

Registration:

https://tlaonline.ca/viewEvent.html?productId=6309

Complimentary tickets are available for Law School Students. Contact Sandra Porter at events@tlaonline.ca

Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (CIAJ) Three-Minute Video Contest

CIAJ’s Three-Minute Video Contest
Law Students Are Invited to Share Their Thought s on a Key Issue

 

In 2020, the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (CIAJ) will host its 45th Annual Conference in Vancouver on “Indigenous Peoples and the Law.” CIAJ wishes to hear the voices of law students on a subject so fundamental to Canadian law and governance.

 

Students are invited to submit a three-minute video to answer the following question: “What will be the most important legal issue for the next generation regarding the relationship between Indigenous Peoples and Canadian institutions?”

 

Participants must present their argument to the camera in the style of the “Three Minute Thesis Competition.” The strongest videos will be presented at CIAJ’s 2019 Annual Conference in Quebec City, October 16–18, 2019. They will also be presented at CIAJ’s 2020 Annual Conference in Vancouver, where the winning video will be incorporated into the Student Panel.

 

Details: https://ciaj-icaj.ca/en/featured-3-minute-video-2019/
Deadline: September 30, 2019

External Announcements: Calls for Papers

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS — WESTERN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS — WESTERN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES

Do you have an “A”-level law paper? The WJLS is seeking academic research papers, white papers, opinion-editorials, and book reviews. All submissions received by noon on Monday, September 16th, 2019 will be considered for publication in our Winter 2020 issue. We assess submissions using a two-part blind peer review, and as such, all submissions will remain entirely anonymous throughout the process. Submissions received after this date will be considered on a rolling basis. Please visit https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/uwojls/submissions to submit articles for consideration. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

Sincerely, 

The WJLS Editorial Board (wjls@uwo.ca

Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues call for submissions

The Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues (“Windsor Review”) is now inviting contributions for Volume 41, to be published in Summer 2020. The Windsor Review has an open call for submissions until October 1, 2019.

Any questions should be emailed to wrlsisolicitations@uwindsor.ca, directed to the Solicitations Editor, Ali Tejani.

 

"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform", the law journal published through the Faculty of Law at the University of Victoria, is accepting submissions

"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform, the law journal published through the Faculty of Law at the University of Victoria, is accepting submissions for Volume 25, to be published in Spring 2020.

 

The deadline for submissions is October 8, 2019. 

 

Please direct all submissions and inquiries to appeal@uvic.ca, or see uvic.ca/law/jd/appeal/

 

Appeal publishes essays, articles, case commentaries, and book reviews offering insightful commentary on contemporary issues in Canadian and comparative law. Because Appeal is student-run, it primarily publishes student scholarship.

 

Submissions must be sent in Microsoft Word document format, and citations must be footnoted according to the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation, 9th Edition (the "McGill Guide").

 

Submissions may be any length, but a 3,000 to 9,000 word limit is suggested. The Editorial Board will consider the content of a submission and the form of the submission when assessing word limits (book reviews should contain fewer words than essays, as an example). Papers should have been completed while studying at the undergraduate or graduate law student level. 

 

Submissions must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere."

Call for Submissions to the Lakehead Law Journal

The LLJ is a refereed open access academic journal affiliated with the Faculty of Law at Lakehead University. We are currently inviting submissions for both issues of the 2019-2020 academic year. Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2019) seeks articles focused broadly on Indigenous Knowledge, Cultural Heritage, Traditional Knowledge, and Traditional Cultural Expressions and their intersections with Canadian and International law. Vol. 4, Issue 1 (2020) seeks articles broadly focused on Access to Justice in Canada.


Please note that the submission deadline for Volume 3:3 is October 21, 2019 and that the submission deadline for Volume 4:1 is February 3, 2020.


Please find the call for submissions attached in .pdf format. For more information on submissions and journal policies, please visit llj.lakeheadu.ca or email us at lawjournal@lakeheadu.ca.

External Announcements: Other

Review of the University of Toronto Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment: in-person consultations

Open in-person consultations are happening this month on each campus for the Review of the University of Toronto Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment. All of the information can be found online as well as in the following Facebook links:

 

UTM

September 23, 2019 at UTM in the Council Chamber (Davis building, room 3130)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

UTSC

September 24, 2019 at UTSC in the Council Chamber (Arts & Administration building, room 160)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

St. George

September 25, 2019 on the St. George Campus in the Governing Council Chamber (Simcoe Hall, room 214)

  • Session for faculty: 10:00 am – 11:00 am
  • Session for staff: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
  • Session for students: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

 

Please note that the online consultation form will remain open until September 30th, 2019.

Prof. Anver Emon hosts conference “Ibadism and the Study of Islam: A View from the Edge”

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

https://www.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/Ibadi-conference-group-photo-weblead.jpgThe 10th annual Conference on Ibadi Studies welcomed a diverse range of global scholars to discuss historical and contemporary topics in Ibadism (photo by D. Olms)

By Jovana Jankovic

Jackman Law Building atrium bustling at annual Clubs Fair

Friday, September 6, 2019

The annual Clubs Fair, which introduces the incoming 1L students to the wide range of extra-curricular activities available at the law school, had the atrium of the Jackman Law Building abuzz on Thursday Sept. 5 as students crowded around the booths of the wide variety of clubs and organizations on offer.

Students at clubs fair in atrium of Jackman Law Building

Registration for Mindfulness program: March 30, 12:30 – 2:00: Enhancing Cognitive Efficacy

This event has been cancelled. 

Register below for March 30, 12:30 – 2:00: Enhancing Cognitive Efficacy. See information and the schedule here.

Note that you can register for individual sessions without taking all of them.

Pages