Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Group shot of 2019 criminal law externship program at Faculty of Law

Providing mentorship and feedback to U of T law students: (L) Adjunct professor Michael Dineen, 3L Glen Tucker, 3L SuJung Lee, 3L Kenzie Bunting, with adjunct professors Gerald Chan, Nader Hasan and Erin Dann, and externship co-supervisor Professor Vincent Chiao.

 

By Peter Boisseau / Photography by Dhoui Chang

A unique U of T Law externship seminar course unlike anything offered by other Canadian universities is helping balance the scales of justice, as students lend their talents to some of the best criminal appeal lawyers in Canada.

In just four years of existence, the legal arguments and research generated through the student course work have weighed in on a string of benchmark appellate and Supreme Court victories, including decisions on privacy, sentencing and insanity pleas.

Along the way, students have been getting rare exposure to appellate court work before they even graduate, often with career-changing results.

“That experience with the appellate externship definitely affected my trajectory,” says 2018 U of T law school graduate Jessica Bishara, who is now clerking at Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice.

“I learned a lot, met some great lawyers and worked on some really interesting things I otherwise would not have had a chance to that early in my legal career.”

The lawyers have been so generous about providing mentorship and feedback to the students. These are some of the most highly regarded criminal appellate lawyers in the country, and it’s a privilege to work with them.

Inspired by law schools in the United States that offer appellate and Supreme Court clinics, the externship is being overseen this year by Professor Vincent Chiao and the other lawyer/instructors who helped conceive the program, including U of T alumni Nader Hasan, Michael Dineen and Jonathan Dawe (who was recently appointed a Superior Court judge, and so will not be continuing as an externship overseer), as well as Gerald Chan of Osgoode Hall Law School.

“This is the only law school clinic or externship of its kind in Canada focused on appellate and Supreme Court advocacy,” says Chiao.

“It’s worked out well because the lawyers have been so generous about providing mentorship and feedback to the students. These are some of the most highly regarded criminal appellate lawyers in the country, and it’s a privilege to work with them.”

Enrolment in the seminar is limited to four third-year students. “This is by far the most popular externship on campus and the hardest to get into,” says Chiao.

The students work with Chiao or his law school colleague, Professor Simon Stern, and more closely with the adjunct-professor lawyers, to help research legal issues, draft memos and contribute to factums.

Law students have been involved in virtually all the pro bono and legal aid appeal cases the four lawyers have handled, says Hasan.

TBC

SuJung Lee says the externship has sharpened her legal research and database skills.

They have also played a key role in the Ontario Court of Appeal inmate duty counsel program, a crucially important court-led initiative to help unrepresented litigants who have been denied legal aid, he says.

All four adjunct professors in the externship are on the court program’s duty counsel roster, which requires they argue multiple cases a day against well-resourced Crown attorneys.

“Arguing those cases with the resources brought to bear against a lawyer acting pro bono is an immense amount of work, and the students help fill that gap,” says Hasan.

“They have done admirable work, researching issues of law in a hurry under real time pressure. We wouldn’t do this externship if not for our belief in the students, and year after year they show us that they can add significant value.”

This year’s cohort of students have been adding to that legacy, generating original research and new legal perspectives on everything from sentencing guidelines for Indigenous defendants to police tactics in “Mr. Big” sting operations, which are starting to generate appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada. Mr. Big stings involve undercover police officers pretending to be members of a made-up criminal organization who try to recruit a suspect in order to extract a confession for another crime.

While the Criminal Code states Indigenous heritage needs to be considered in sentencing, the research law student Glen Tucker is doing suggests that directive is applied inconsistently at best.

Instead of giving a discount to Indigenous defendants, he is finding that courts in some jurisdictions are reconsidering where the line is between serious and non-serious offences.

“It doesn’t look good for the policy of taking those factors of Indigenous heritage into consideration,” says Tucker, who is putting together a table of the stats for a sentencing appeal he’s working on with Dineen.

“Those stats should hopefully help our argument.”

He says the experiences he’s had with the externship helped solidify and confirm his career goals.

“I’ve always known I was going into criminal law and I’ve already decided I will be articling for the Crown, but this is my first real exposure to the appeal side, and it’s possible I could eventually switch sides and end up working for the defence.”

Law student SuJung Lee was researching jury instructions and gained fascinating insights into how evidence from Mr. Big operations is being handled by trial courts, a factor that only recently began to make its way to Supreme Court appeals.

“Because there is so little precedent for this at the Supreme Court level, it’s been a real challenge finding cases that are on point,” says Lee.

“I’ve tried to get around that gap in the case law by being creative and looking at a lot of secondary articles on legal arguments, like what kind of statements from the defendant that come out in these investigations can be used in court and trying to find research to support those.”

Lee says the externship has helped hone her research skills and familiarity with legal databases.

“The other thing I’ve found really interesting is gaining insights into what kind of practical arguments are persuasive enough to go to an appeal court or the Supreme Court.”

Kenzie Bunting says the externship has been a contrast to the criminal defence work she did as a summer student in a law office.

“Appeal work is a lot more substantive than my summer work because it’s mainly based on questions of law as opposed to questions of fact.”

One of the high points so far was seeing her research incorporated into a submission that stumped the court, which had expected to rule the same day.

“They actually had to go away for a few days to consider their decision, which was really cool because it meant we gave them particular facts that were a real thinker,” says Bunting.

“I think a lot of people in law school are perfectionists like me, but having to do this kind of work and send it to lawyers you very much admire helps you get over your fears.”

Dawe says the work varies from year to year, but it is always valuable for both the lawyers and the students.

“They get to see their work being used in real cases that have real consequences for real people,” says Dawe.

“I think it’s something we would have liked to have back in our own law school days, and we all have a sense of obligation to do what we can to reach the students who might be interested in this kind of work, which we think is important and necessary.”

The criminal appeal bar is a small and distinct practice and can be difficult to break into without the kind of early exposure the externship provides, adds Dineen.

“The work we’ve gotten from the students has been really valuable and they’ve come up with perspectives we haven’t even thought of.”