Economic Analysis of Law

Profs. Iacobucci and Trebilcock - "How to privatize Canada Post"

Monday, April 16, 2012

In a commentary in the Financial Post, Profs. Edward Iacobucci and Michael Trebilcock analyze the issues that would be involved in privatizing postal services in Canada ("How to privatize Canada Post," March 27, 2012).

Read the full commentary on the Financial Post website.

Profs Schneiderman and Morgan comment on legalities of attempted Occupy Toronto eviction

Thursday, December 15, 2011

In the Globe and Mail, Prof. David Schneiderman has written a commentary on the City of Toronto's attempt to evict the Occupy Toronto protesters from St. James' Park ("Toronto’s protesters have the right to stay put," Nov. 17, 2011).

Jim Tory Law & Economics Public Lecture

THE 2011 MEETINGS OF THE CANADIAN LAW AND ECONOMICS ASSOCIATION
Jim Tory Law and Economics Public Lecture

Innovation Policy, Carbon Pricing and the Dynamics of Global Warming

Professor Ralph Winter
Canada Research Chair in Business Economics and Public Policy 
Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia

1:30 - 2:30
Friday, September 23, 2011

Critical Analysis of Law Workshop: Bernard Harcourt

NEW LOCATION 

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LAW WORKHOP SERIES

presents

Bernard Harcourt
University of Chicago

Against Public Policy: A Critique of Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis 

Thursday, September 29, 2011
12:30 – 2:00 

Law and Economics Workshop: Joshua Fischman

Law &  Economics Workshop series

presents 

Professor Joshua  Fischman
University of Virginia Law School

Inconsistency, Indeterminacy, and Error in Adjudication

Tuesday, November 15, 2011
4:10 – 6:00

Solarium (room FA2) – Falconer Hall
84 Queen’s Park

Law and Economics Workshop: Alan Schwartz

LAW & ECONOMICS WORKSHOP

presents

Professor Alan Schwartz
Yale University Law School and Management School

Conceptualizing Contractual Interpretation

Tuesday, January 17, 2012
4:10 – 6:00

Solarium (room FA2) – Falconer Hall
84 Queen’s Park

Prof. Ed Morgan - "The Canada-U.S. subsidy divide"

Thursday, May 12, 2011

In a commentary in the Globe and Mail, Prof. Ed Morgan analyzes the differences between the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States in their approach to third-party spending on election campaigns ("The Canada-U.S. subsidy divide," April 7, 2011).

Read the full commentary.

Pages