Intensive Course: Adhesion Contracts: The Perils of Clicking "I Agree" (LAW447H1S)

At a Glance

Second Term
Credits
1
Hours
14

Enrolment

Maximum
25
20 JD
5 LLM/SJD

Schedule

Monday, January 7, 2013: 2:00 - 4:00
Tuesday, January 8, 2013: 6:10 - 8:10
Thursday, January 10, 2013: 4:00 - 6:00
Friday, January 11, 2013: 12:00 - 2:00
Monday, January 14, 2013: 6:10 - 8:10
Tuesday, January 15, 2013: 2:00 - 4:00
Wednesday, January 16, 2013: 8:20 - 10:20
Instructor(s): Margaret Jane Radin

Schedule
Mon, Jan 7, 2013: 2:00 - 4:00 FLV
Tue, Jan 8, 2013: 6:10 - 8:10 FLV
Thu, Jan 10, 2013: 4:00 – 6:00 FLB
Fri, Jan 11, 2013: 12:00 - 2:00 FA3
Mon, Jan 14, 2013: 6:10 – 8:10 FLV
Tue, Jan 15, 2013: 2:00 – 4:00 FA3
Wed, Jan 16, 2013: 8:20 - 10:20 FA3

Contracts of adhesion, known as boilerplate, are pervasive in contemporary life.  Yet mass-market boilerplate, which we hardly every read, is problematic from the point of view of the underlying theory of contract, which involves agreement to a bargained-for exchange between two parties.  In this seminar we examine the theories, practices, and legal status of boilerplate.  How does boilerplate square with contract theory?  Is enforcement of boilerplate justified by some version of consent by recipients?  By economic efficiency? Is widespread use of boilerplate harmful to the rule of law and democratic ordering? Can we devise better practices for protecting the rights of those who become subject to boilerplate, particularly in the online context?  Should boilerplate used between commercial parties be treated differently from boilerplate between a firm and consumers?  How does boilerplate in digital commerce fit with contract law and the normative and political justification for enforcement?  How can we tell the difference between "good" and "bad" boilerplate?  We will review current legal regulation of boilerplate, and consider possible new methods of boilerplate evaluation and oversight, including possible market and user initiatives, regulatory interventions, and improvement of adjudication.  This seminar will probably be most appropriate for students interested in contract theory and for those interested in examining the US approach to boilerplate and comparing it with other approaches, either in use elsewhere or proposed.

Evaluation
Students will be required to write a paper of 2500 to 3000 words, which will be graded on an Honours/Pass/Fail basis for JD students and the SGS scale for graduate students. Papers must be delivered to the Records Office by 4:00 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013.